2009Unpublished venueRequires access

Chapter Three. The Diaspora And The Homeland: Reciprocities, Transformations, And Role Reversals

William Safran

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Diaspora is part of a transnational and transpolitical ethnoscape. This ethnoscape may be newly created-hence one may speak of new or potential diasporas, such as the Cuban, Hmong, or Palestinian. Diaspora implies cultural reproduction (Vertovec 2000, 2001). This process is a two-way street with a reciprocal impact on the diaspora and the homeland. This chapter suggests that the traditional view of diaspora as an undesirable condition has yielded in many cases to that of diasporas as lands of greater freedom than is found in the homeland. In most countries of the diaspora, Jews were regarded as members of a religious community. The fact that a large proportion of Israelis are secular should contribute to greater understanding across the diaspora-homeland divide; however, secular Jews in Israel identify primarily as Israelis, whereas secular diaspora Jews are largely self-identified as American, French, or English. Keywords: homeland; secular diaspora Jews; secular Jews

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Diaspora is part of a transnational and transpolitical ethnoscape. This ethnoscape may be newly created-hence one may speak of new or potential diasporas, such as the Cuban, Hmong, or Palestinian. Diaspora implies cultural reproduction (Vertovec 2000, 2001). This process is a two-way street with a reciprocal impact on the diaspora and the homeland. This chapter suggests that the traditional view of diaspora as an undesirable condition has yielded in many cases to that of diasporas as lands of greater freedom than is found in the homeland. In most countries of the diaspora, Jews were regarded as members of a religious community. The fact that a large proportion of Israelis are secular should contribute to greater understanding across the diaspora-homeland divide; however, secular Jews in Israel identify primarily as Israelis, whereas secular diaspora Jews are largely self-identified as American, French, or English. Keywords: homeland; secular diaspora Jews; secular Jews

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Diaspora is part of a transnational and transpolitical ethnoscape. This ethnoscape may be newly created-hence one may speak of new or potential diasporas, such as the Cuban, Hmong, or Palestinian. Diaspora implies cultural reproduction (Vertovec 2000, 2001). This process is a two-way street with a reciprocal impact on the diaspora and the homeland. This chapter suggests that the traditional view of diaspora as an undesirable condition has yielded in many cases to that of diasporas as lands of greater freedom than is found in the homeland. In most countries of the diaspora, Jews were regarded as members of a religious community. The fact that a large proportion of Israelis are secular should contribute to greater understanding across the diaspora-homeland divide; however, secular Jews in Israel identify primarily as Israelis, whereas secular diaspora Jews are largely self-identified as American, French, or English. Keywords: homeland; secular diaspora Jews; secular Jews

Key concepts: Diaspora, Homeland, History, Political science, Economic geography, Sociology, Geography, Gender studies

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chapter Three. The Diaspora And The Homeland: Reciprocities, Transformations, And Role Reversals — Research Paper | ScholarLens