Assessing IRI vs. PI as a Measurement of Pavement Smoothness
Nicolas Gagarine, James Mekemson, Charles J. Nemmers
Abstract
Nicolas Gagarine, James Mekemson, Charles J. Nemmers
Abstract
A pavement specification that allows either the International Roughness Index (IRI) or Profile Index (PI) to measure pavement would be advantageous to both industry and the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT). This brief study provides for MoDOT an understanding of the relationship between IRI and PI, an analysis comparing the two systems, and a review of potential specifications, and offers a smoothness adjustment table that would fit into Section 502.15.3 of the Missouri specifications. Furthermore safeguards against the potential manipulation of the data within both IRI and PI systems are discussed. With proper certification procedures for equipment and operators and a random verification program on the measurement of smoothness, it is unlikely that the state DOT will encounter a problem with systematic alterations of inertial profiling data. Sample specifications from the Connecticut DOT, the Ohio DOT, and the Minnesota DOT are included in the report as they are good examples of specifications that MoDOT may wish to use as a pattern for its specification.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A pavement specification that allows either the International Roughness Index (IRI) or Profile Index (PI) to measure pavement would be advantageous to both industry and the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT). This brief study provides for MoDOT an understanding of the relationship between IRI and PI, an analysis comparing the two systems, and a review of potential specifications, and offers a smoothness adjustment table that would fit into Section 502.15.3 of the Missouri specifications. Furthermore safeguards against the potential manipulation of the data within both IRI and PI systems are discussed. With proper certification procedures for equipment and operators and a random verification program on the measurement of smoothness, it is unlikely that the state DOT will encounter a problem with systematic alterations of inertial profiling data. Sample specifications from the Connecticut DOT, the Ohio DOT, and the Minnesota DOT are included in the report as they are good examples of specifications that MoDOT may wish to use as a pattern for its specification.
Key concepts: Smoothness, International Roughness Index, Certification, Computer science, Engineering, Surface finish, Reliability engineering, Data mining