2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Potential gains from post-Uruguay round trade policy reform: impacts on developing countries.

Betina Dimaranan, Thomas W. Hertel, Will Martín, Alex F. McCalla, John Nash

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The impacts of further trade liberalization after the Uruguay Round are assessed using the GTAP model, a multi-region, general equilibrium model. The analysis quantifies the trade impacts and welfare gains from trade liberalization by developed countries only, by developing countries only, from full multilateral liberalization, and from partial multilateral liberalization. It goes beyond past modeling of global trade reform by incorporating key tariff preferences. The simulation results indicate that each liberalizing country group benefits more from liberalization by its partners than from its own reforms. Liberalization by developing countries only will result in expansion of trade two and half times greater than the trade expansion from developed country liberalization. Developed countries reap a larger share of the gains (73%) from full liberalization, than their own liberalization contributes (47%) to global gains. They benefit most from agricultural tariff liberalization and the removal of domestic farm support, whereas developing countries benefit most from the liberalization of manufactures trade. Developing countries garner only 27% of the global gains from full liberalization while their liberalization contributes 53% of this total. When the global gains are broken down by type of instrument being liberalized, we find that 84% of the global gains derive from tariff liberalization, of which 35% is associated with agriculture and food tariffs and 48% is from manufactures. The remaining 16% of the global gains derive primarily from the elimination of domestic support for agriculture. When viewed in total, about half of the global gains available from merchandise trade liberalization following completion of the Uruguay Round are associated with food and agriculture – a sector which accounts for just 10% of global GDP. This highlights the critical importance of making progress on the agriculture negotiations in the Doha Development Round.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The impacts of further trade liberalization after the Uruguay Round are assessed using the GTAP model, a multi-region, general equilibrium model. The analysis quantifies the trade impacts and welfare gains from trade liberalization by developed countries only, by developing countries only, from full multilateral liberalization, and from partial multilateral liberalization. It goes beyond past modeling of global trade reform by incorporating key tariff preferences. The simulation results indicate that each liberalizing country group benefits more from liberalization by its partners than from its own reforms. Liberalization by developing countries only will result in expansion of trade two and half times greater than the trade expansion from developed country liberalization. Developed countries reap a larger share of the gains (73%) from full liberalization, than their own liberalization contributes (47%) to global gains. They benefit most from agricultural tariff liberalization and the removal of domestic farm support, whereas developing countries benefit most from the liberalization of manufactures trade. Developing countries garner only 27% of the global gains from full liberalization while their liberalization contributes 53% of this total. When the global gains are broken down by type of instrument being liberalized, we find that 84% of the global gains derive from tariff liberalization, of which 35% is associated with agriculture and food tariffs and 48% is from manufactures. The remaining 16% of the global gains derive primarily from the elimination of domestic support for agriculture. When viewed in total, about half of the global gains available from merchandise trade liberalization following completion of the Uruguay Round are associated with food and agriculture – a sector which accounts for just 10% of global GDP. This highlights the critical importance of making progress on the agriculture negotiations in the Doha Development Round.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The impacts of further trade liberalization after the Uruguay Round are assessed using the GTAP model, a multi-region, general equilibrium model. The analysis quantifies the trade impacts and welfare gains from trade liberalization by developed countries only, by developing countries only, from full multilateral liberalization, and from partial multilateral liberalization. It goes beyond past modeling of global trade reform by incorporating key tariff preferences. The simulation results indicate that each liberalizing country group benefits more from liberalization by its partners than from its own reforms. Liberalization by developing countries only will result in expansion of trade two and half times greater than the trade expansion from developed country liberalization. Developed countries reap a larger share of the gains (73%) from full liberalization, than their own liberalization contributes (47%) to global gains. They benefit most from agricultural tariff liberalization and the removal of domestic farm support, whereas developing countries benefit most from the liberalization of manufactures trade. Developing countries garner only 27% of the global gains from full liberalization while their liberalization contributes 53% of this total. When the global gains are broken down by type of instrument being liberalized, we find that 84% of the global gains derive from tariff liberalization, of which 35% is associated with agriculture and food tariffs and 48% is from manufactures. The remaining 16% of the global gains derive primarily from the elimination of domestic support for agriculture. When viewed in total, about half of the global gains available from merchandise trade liberalization following completion of the Uruguay Round are associated with food and agriculture – a sector which accounts for just 10% of global GDP. This highlights the critical importance of making progress on the agriculture negotiations in the Doha Development Round.

Key concepts: Liberalization, Free trade, Tariff, International economics, Economics, Developing country, International trade, Welfare

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Potential gains from post-Uruguay round trade policy reform: impacts on developing countries. — Research Paper | ScholarLens