2007Documentos de trabajo. Economic series ( Universidad Carlos III. Departamento de Economía )Requires access

Intermediate goods and total factor productivity

Alessio Moro

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

The share of intermediate goods in gross output has declined in the U.S. over the 1958-2004 period. I present a model of gross output production in which the intermediate goods share (IGS) in gross output appears as an explicit part of total factor productivity (TFP) in the value added production function. In particular, a larger IGS implies a smaller TFP level. Therefore, the decline in the IGS can contribute to the observed TFP growth in the U.S. during the period considered. A simple growth accounting exercise shows that when the production function for gross output is Cobb-Douglas in capital, labor and intermediate goods, the IGS accounts for at least 1/4 of TFP growth. With a CES gross output production function, the IGS accounts for up to 61% of TFP growth. Using this accounting procedure, I also find that intermediate goods are responsible for the most part of the productivity slowdown occurred during the seventies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The share of intermediate goods in gross output has declined in the U.S. over the 1958-2004 period. I present a model of gross output production in which the intermediate goods share (IGS) in gross output appears as an explicit part of total factor productivity (TFP) in the value added production function. In particular, a larger IGS implies a smaller TFP level. Therefore, the decline in the IGS can contribute to the observed TFP growth in the U.S. during the period considered. A simple growth accounting exercise shows that when the production function for gross output is Cobb-Douglas in capital, labor and intermediate goods, the IGS accounts for at least 1/4 of TFP growth. With a CES gross output production function, the IGS accounts for up to 61% of TFP growth. Using this accounting procedure, I also find that intermediate goods are responsible for the most part of the productivity slowdown occurred during the seventies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The share of intermediate goods in gross output has declined in the U.S. over the 1958-2004 period. I present a model of gross output production in which the intermediate goods share (IGS) in gross output appears as an explicit part of total factor productivity (TFP) in the value added production function. In particular, a larger IGS implies a smaller TFP level. Therefore, the decline in the IGS can contribute to the observed TFP growth in the U.S. during the period considered. A simple growth accounting exercise shows that when the production function for gross output is Cobb-Douglas in capital, labor and intermediate goods, the IGS accounts for at least 1/4 of TFP growth. With a CES gross output production function, the IGS accounts for up to 61% of TFP growth. Using this accounting procedure, I also find that intermediate goods are responsible for the most part of the productivity slowdown occurred during the seventies.

Key concepts: Total factor productivity, Economics, Gross output, Production (economics), Growth accounting, Productivity, Slowdown, Capital good

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intermediate goods and total factor productivity — Research Paper | ScholarLens