HYDROELASTIC MODEL FOR BOTTOM SLAMMING
A. Bereznitski, Postnov
Abstract
A. Bereznitski, Postnov
Abstract
This paper extensively studies the effect of hydroelasticity for the 2D problem of bottom slamming. A number of wide-shaped structures are considered for water penetration at small deadrise angles. The effect of hydroelasticity is studied as a function of different parameters influencing the impact interaction. These parameters include various stiffness of the structure, presence of entrapped air between the structure and the water surface, and water penetration at different deadrise angles. The primary objective is establishment of range, within which hydroelasticity plays an important role. This range shows when the hydroelasticity should be taken into account and in which cases it can be skipped. The problem is studied with application of MSC.Dytran code. At the same time, for verification purposes, a specific case is compared with results obtained with the application of a self-developed code.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper extensively studies the effect of hydroelasticity for the 2D problem of bottom slamming. A number of wide-shaped structures are considered for water penetration at small deadrise angles. The effect of hydroelasticity is studied as a function of different parameters influencing the impact interaction. These parameters include various stiffness of the structure, presence of entrapped air between the structure and the water surface, and water penetration at different deadrise angles. The primary objective is establishment of range, within which hydroelasticity plays an important role. This range shows when the hydroelasticity should be taken into account and in which cases it can be skipped. The problem is studied with application of MSC.Dytran code. At the same time, for verification purposes, a specific case is compared with results obtained with the application of a self-developed code.
Key concepts: Slamming, Hydroelasticity, Stiffness, Structural engineering, Engineering, Range (aeronautics), Marine engineering, Geology