1997Unpublished venueRequires access

RESTRAINED DRIVERS IN FRONTAL CRASHES: SOME EFFECTS OF SEAT-BELTS AND AIRBAGS DEDUCED FROM FIELD STUDIES

Andrew Morris, Fulvio Bentivegna, Brian Fildes, David J. Kenny, Kate Edwards-Coghill

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The seat belt, when properly worn, greatly reduces the risk of serious injury to the occupants in a frontal crash. However, by reducing the risk of major or fatal injury there is an occasional trade-off with injuries the seat belt itself can cause on the load bearing surfaces of the body. This paper found that out of a sample of 190 frontal impact cases, 50 percent of restrained occupants sustained some sort of injury directly from the seat belt and that 12 percent sustained injuries of a moderate or greater nature. In modern times, airbags designed to complement the effect of the seat belt (otherwise known as supplementary restraint systems) have been introduced. When comparing injury rates in the same sample of drivers (regardless of contact source) according to whether they were in non-airbag or airbag-deployed vehicles, a decrease in injury rates particularly to the neck, chest and abdomen were observed in the airbag-deployed cases. An interesting observation is that the non-airbag cases were found to be involved in higher median severity collisions as compared to the airbag deployed cases. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see IRRD 895304.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The seat belt, when properly worn, greatly reduces the risk of serious injury to the occupants in a frontal crash. However, by reducing the risk of major or fatal injury there is an occasional trade-off with injuries the seat belt itself can cause on the load bearing surfaces of the body. This paper found that out of a sample of 190 frontal impact cases, 50 percent of restrained occupants sustained some sort of injury directly from the seat belt and that 12 percent sustained injuries of a moderate or greater nature. In modern times, airbags designed to complement the effect of the seat belt (otherwise known as supplementary restraint systems) have been introduced. When comparing injury rates in the same sample of drivers (regardless of contact source) according to whether they were in non-airbag or airbag-deployed vehicles, a decrease in injury rates particularly to the neck, chest and abdomen were observed in the airbag-deployed cases. An interesting observation is that the non-airbag cases were found to be involved in higher median severity collisions as compared to the airbag deployed cases. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see IRRD 895304.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The seat belt, when properly worn, greatly reduces the risk of serious injury to the occupants in a frontal crash. However, by reducing the risk of major or fatal injury there is an occasional trade-off with injuries the seat belt itself can cause on the load bearing surfaces of the body. This paper found that out of a sample of 190 frontal impact cases, 50 percent of restrained occupants sustained some sort of injury directly from the seat belt and that 12 percent sustained injuries of a moderate or greater nature. In modern times, airbags designed to complement the effect of the seat belt (otherwise known as supplementary restraint systems) have been introduced. When comparing injury rates in the same sample of drivers (regardless of contact source) according to whether they were in non-airbag or airbag-deployed vehicles, a decrease in injury rates particularly to the neck, chest and abdomen were observed in the airbag-deployed cases. An interesting observation is that the non-airbag cases were found to be involved in higher median severity collisions as compared to the airbag deployed cases. (a) For the covering entry of this conference, please see IRRD 895304.

Key concepts: Airbag, Seat belt, Crash, Chest injury, Poison control, Injury prevention, Forensic engineering, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
RESTRAINED DRIVERS IN FRONTAL CRASHES: SOME EFFECTS OF SEAT-BELTS AND AIRBAGS DEDUCED FROM FIELD STUDIES — Research Paper | ScholarLens