Обсуждение последствий вердикта присяжных заседателей: проблемы законодательного регулирования и Судебной практики
Насонов Сергей Александрович
Abstract
Насонов Сергей Александрович
Abstract
The article is devoted to the questions of discussion of the jury verdict’s effect in modern penal trial. The author considers two different ways of discussion of verdict of acquittal and conviction by the jury. In the article there are presented the judicial interpretation problems of legislative intents controlling the discussion of the jury verdict’s effect.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article is devoted to the questions of discussion of the jury verdict’s effect in modern penal trial. The author considers two different ways of discussion of verdict of acquittal and conviction by the jury. In the article there are presented the judicial interpretation problems of legislative intents controlling the discussion of the jury verdict’s effect.
Key concepts: Verdict, Acquittal, Jury, Conviction, Hung jury, Law, Political science, Interpretation (philosophy)