1985Proc., Annu. Meet., Air Pollut. Control Assoc.; (United States)Requires access

Spatial trend analysis and uncertainty estimates of acid precipitation data in Ontario

A. J. S. Tang, Walter H. Chan

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The use of the Simple Kriging and Universal Kriging methods to estimate the spatial trend in the spatial data is examined. By following the approach of the Simple Kriging methods, a new Modified Kriging method has been developed for better presentation of the spatial pattern of spatial data and error estimation. Results of comparison indicate that the Modified Simple Kriging method can provide better interpolation and error estimation for the mathematical functions. Although the results of practical interpolation obtained by using the three methods are quite comparable, the error estimates by the Simple Kriging and Universal Kriging methods are greater than those of the modified Simple Kriging method and the one standard deviation confidence belts are overlapping each other. This may indicate that the error estimations from the Simple Kriging methods are too great.The Universal Kriging method provides the greatest error estimation among these three methods. Although those results indicate that there is no advantages of using the Universal Kriging method, further study on the proper formula for the generalized covariance function should be carried out. The heart of the Universal Kriging method is to find the correct covariance function, since the isopleths and the error of estimation are verymore » sensitive to it.« less

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The use of the Simple Kriging and Universal Kriging methods to estimate the spatial trend in the spatial data is examined. By following the approach of the Simple Kriging methods, a new Modified Kriging method has been developed for better presentation of the spatial pattern of spatial data and error estimation. Results of comparison indicate that the Modified Simple Kriging method can provide better interpolation and error estimation for the mathematical functions. Although the results of practical interpolation obtained by using the three methods are quite comparable, the error estimates by the Simple Kriging and Universal Kriging methods are greater than those of the modified Simple Kriging method and the one standard deviation confidence belts are overlapping each other. This may indicate that the error estimations from the Simple Kriging methods are too great.The Universal Kriging method provides the greatest error estimation among these three methods. Although those results indicate that there is no advantages of using the Universal Kriging method, further study on the proper formula for the generalized covariance function should be carried out. The heart of the Universal Kriging method is to find the correct covariance function, since the isopleths and the error of estimation are verymore » sensitive to it.« less

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The use of the Simple Kriging and Universal Kriging methods to estimate the spatial trend in the spatial data is examined. By following the approach of the Simple Kriging methods, a new Modified Kriging method has been developed for better presentation of the spatial pattern of spatial data and error estimation. Results of comparison indicate that the Modified Simple Kriging method can provide better interpolation and error estimation for the mathematical functions. Although the results of practical interpolation obtained by using the three methods are quite comparable, the error estimates by the Simple Kriging and Universal Kriging methods are greater than those of the modified Simple Kriging method and the one standard deviation confidence belts are overlapping each other. This may indicate that the error estimations from the Simple Kriging methods are too great.The Universal Kriging method provides the greatest error estimation among these three methods. Although those results indicate that there is no advantages of using the Universal Kriging method, further study on the proper formula for the generalized covariance function should be carried out. The heart of the Universal Kriging method is to find the correct covariance function, since the isopleths and the error of estimation are verymore » sensitive to it.« less

Key concepts: Kriging, Interpolation (computer graphics), Variogram, Covariance, Mathematics, Multivariate interpolation, Statistics, Covariance function

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spatial trend analysis and uncertainty estimates of acid precipitation data in Ontario — Research Paper | ScholarLens