2006Unpublished venueRequires access

7 Judicial Reform

Keyuan Zou

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The scope of this chapter is limited to the judicial reform relating to the court and the procuratorate. It can be concluded that, although the current judicial reform is positive and can be regarded as link in the chain of overall political reform, it is not prerequisite to push forward fundamental change in China's political structure since it centres only on the improvement of the work of the courts and the procuratorate as well as the quality of judicial personnel, rather than seriously addressing the judiciary's independence. It is believed that judicial reform will still be progressing, though slowly and sometimes not smoothly, towards the rule of law, which is manifested by the second Five-Year Programme (2005-2010) further to increase the judicial reform issued by the Supreme Court in April 2005. An American legal scholar describes China's legal reform as a bird in cage.Keywords: judicial reform; rule of law

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The scope of this chapter is limited to the judicial reform relating to the court and the procuratorate. It can be concluded that, although the current judicial reform is positive and can be regarded as link in the chain of overall political reform, it is not prerequisite to push forward fundamental change in China's political structure since it centres only on the improvement of the work of the courts and the procuratorate as well as the quality of judicial personnel, rather than seriously addressing the judiciary's independence. It is believed that judicial reform will still be progressing, though slowly and sometimes not smoothly, towards the rule of law, which is manifested by the second Five-Year Programme (2005-2010) further to increase the judicial reform issued by the Supreme Court in April 2005. An American legal scholar describes China's legal reform as a bird in cage.Keywords: judicial reform; rule of law

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The scope of this chapter is limited to the judicial reform relating to the court and the procuratorate. It can be concluded that, although the current judicial reform is positive and can be regarded as link in the chain of overall political reform, it is not prerequisite to push forward fundamental change in China's political structure since it centres only on the improvement of the work of the courts and the procuratorate as well as the quality of judicial personnel, rather than seriously addressing the judiciary's independence. It is believed that judicial reform will still be progressing, though slowly and sometimes not smoothly, towards the rule of law, which is manifested by the second Five-Year Programme (2005-2010) further to increase the judicial reform issued by the Supreme Court in April 2005. An American legal scholar describes China's legal reform as a bird in cage.Keywords: judicial reform; rule of law

Key concepts: Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
7 Judicial Reform — Research Paper | ScholarLens