Neutrality and impartiality in mediation
H.Y. Hung
Abstract
H.Y. Hung
Abstract
Extract: In the mediation process the parties in dispute usually come with conflicting positions, interests and arguments that they strongly hold to be right and the opposite parties’ to be wrong. The mediator, as an independent third party to the dispute, is there to assist the disputants to communicate with each other in a rational and problem solving way, to identify and clarify disputed issues, consider available options and reach a consensual settlement that is fair and equitable to all parties.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Extract: In the mediation process the parties in dispute usually come with conflicting positions, interests and arguments that they strongly hold to be right and the opposite parties’ to be wrong. The mediator, as an independent third party to the dispute, is there to assist the disputants to communicate with each other in a rational and problem solving way, to identify and clarify disputed issues, consider available options and reach a consensual settlement that is fair and equitable to all parties.
Key concepts: Impartiality, Neutrality, Mediation, Political science, Psychology, Social psychology, Law and economics, Law