Democratic decentralization in the forestry sector: lessons learned from Africa, Asia and Latin America.
Anne Larson
Abstract
Anne Larson
Abstract
Local governments are increasingly important actors in forest management. More than 60 countries say that they are decentralizing some aspect of natural resources management (Agrawal, 2001). And even where forestsector decentralization is not part of national policy, local governments and local people often manage local forest resources, with or without formal mandates.
OpenAlex reports 137 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Local governments are increasingly important actors in forest management. More than 60 countries say that they are decentralizing some aspect of natural resources management (Agrawal, 2001). And even where forestsector decentralization is not part of national policy, local governments and local people often manage local forest resources, with or without formal mandates.
Key concepts: Decentralization, Latin Americans, Natural resource, Democracy, Natural resource management, Political science, Forestry, Business