1989•Indian highwaysRequires access

FUNDING PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEMS IN METROPOLITAN CITIES

T R Bhau

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper considers various aspects of the financing of public transport in large Indian cities, which face a vicious circle of rising costs and fares and declining services and patronage. The author discusses: (1) basic problems of funding; (2) funding practices in India and other countries; (3) sources of finance; and (4) financial strategies. He presents the following conclusions and recommendations: (1) India does not yet consider its transport system an essential part of its economy; (2) the basic problem of Indian public transport is lack of availability of the right funds at the right time; (3) traffic management and control measures should supplement capital-intensive transport projects; (4) a single coordinating authority should plan, administer and finance public transport; (5) there is not yet any legal basis for raining adequate funds for public transport; (6) urban public transport systems, both bus and rail, should be placed under integrated authorities, separate from the intercity rail system; (7) a flexible fare policy should be developed, to cover operating costs at least; (8) Indian public transport should be financed jointly by national, state and local governments and from other sources; (9) the Delhi development authority should support public transport by cross-subsidising from land resources; (10) employers should be charged some amount per employee to assist public transport; (11) people in higher income groups should contribute through a surcharge on sales tax; and (12) central government could provide loans interest-free or at low interest rates. (TRRL)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper considers various aspects of the financing of public transport in large Indian cities, which face a vicious circle of rising costs and fares and declining services and patronage. The author discusses: (1) basic problems of funding; (2) funding practices in India and other countries; (3) sources of finance; and (4) financial strategies. He presents the following conclusions and recommendations: (1) India does not yet consider its transport system an essential part of its economy; (2) the basic problem of Indian public transport is lack of availability of the right funds at the right time; (3) traffic management and control measures should supplement capital-intensive transport projects; (4) a single coordinating authority should plan, administer and finance public transport; (5) there is not yet any legal basis for raining adequate funds for public transport; (6) urban public transport systems, both bus and rail, should be placed under integrated authorities, separate from the intercity rail system; (7) a flexible fare policy should be developed, to cover operating costs at least; (8) Indian public transport should be financed jointly by national, state and local governments and from other sources; (9) the Delhi development authority should support public transport by cross-subsidising from land resources; (10) employers should be charged some amount per employee to assist public transport; (11) people in higher income groups should contribute through a surcharge on sales tax; and (12) central government could provide loans interest-free or at low interest rates. (TRRL)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper considers various aspects of the financing of public transport in large Indian cities, which face a vicious circle of rising costs and fares and declining services and patronage. The author discusses: (1) basic problems of funding; (2) funding practices in India and other countries; (3) sources of finance; and (4) financial strategies. He presents the following conclusions and recommendations: (1) India does not yet consider its transport system an essential part of its economy; (2) the basic problem of Indian public transport is lack of availability of the right funds at the right time; (3) traffic management and control measures should supplement capital-intensive transport projects; (4) a single coordinating authority should plan, administer and finance public transport; (5) there is not yet any legal basis for raining adequate funds for public transport; (6) urban public transport systems, both bus and rail, should be placed under integrated authorities, separate from the intercity rail system; (7) a flexible fare policy should be developed, to cover operating costs at least; (8) Indian public transport should be financed jointly by national, state and local governments and from other sources; (9) the Delhi development authority should support public transport by cross-subsidising from land resources; (10) employers should be charged some amount per employee to assist public transport; (11) people in higher income groups should contribute through a surcharge on sales tax; and (12) central government could provide loans interest-free or at low interest rates. (TRRL)

Key concepts: Public transport, Metropolitan area, Finance, Business, Government (linguistics), Public finance, Economics, Economic growth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
FUNDING PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEMS IN METROPOLITAN CITIES — Research Paper | ScholarLens