Structuralism and category theory in the contemporary philosophy of mathematics
Izabela Bondecka-Krzykowska, Roman Murawski
Abstract
Izabela Bondecka-Krzykowska, Roman Murawski
Abstract
The set-theoretical (Bourbaki-style) and category-theoretical approach to structuralism in the philosophy of mathematics are compared. Advantages and disadvantages of those approaches are indicated. We come to the conclusion that category theory can be the language of mathematical structuralism but one should be careful to claim that it can serve as a foundation for the whole of mathematics.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The set-theoretical (Bourbaki-style) and category-theoretical approach to structuralism in the philosophy of mathematics are compared. Advantages and disadvantages of those approaches are indicated. We come to the conclusion that category theory can be the language of mathematical structuralism but one should be careful to claim that it can serve as a foundation for the whole of mathematics.
Key concepts: Structuralism (philosophy of science), Category theory, Foundations of mathematics, Philosophy of mathematics, Foundation (evidence), Mathematics, Set theory, Epistemology