1987NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)Open access

Long-range LFC transport

W. Pfenninger

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

M = 0.83 Laminar Flow Control (LFC) transports, carrying large percentage payloads over a range of 20000 kilometers at cruise L/D's of 39 appear feasible with large space externally braced wings, external fuel pods, active controls, and 70 percent laminar flow on wing and tail surfaces, engine nacelles and struts, and a turbulent fuselage. A combination of a swept-forward inboard and a swept-back outer wing appears superior overall, especially for laminar flow and eliminating leading edge contamination probably caused by flyspecks and ice crystals. Wing divergence appears controllable by a combination of various methods. Wind-mounted superfans with extensive laminar flow on their nacelles appear practical. Their dominant tone noise is below the frequency range of the most strongly amplified TS-waves.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

M = 0.83 Laminar Flow Control (LFC) transports, carrying large percentage payloads over a range of 20000 kilometers at cruise L/D's of 39 appear feasible with large space externally braced wings, external fuel pods, active controls, and 70 percent laminar flow on wing and tail surfaces, engine nacelles and struts, and a turbulent fuselage. A combination of a swept-forward inboard and a swept-back outer wing appears superior overall, especially for laminar flow and eliminating leading edge contamination probably caused by flyspecks and ice crystals. Wing divergence appears controllable by a combination of various methods. Wind-mounted superfans with extensive laminar flow on their nacelles appear practical. Their dominant tone noise is below the frequency range of the most strongly amplified TS-waves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

M = 0.83 Laminar Flow Control (LFC) transports, carrying large percentage payloads over a range of 20000 kilometers at cruise L/D's of 39 appear feasible with large space externally braced wings, external fuel pods, active controls, and 70 percent laminar flow on wing and tail surfaces, engine nacelles and struts, and a turbulent fuselage. A combination of a swept-forward inboard and a swept-back outer wing appears superior overall, especially for laminar flow and eliminating leading edge contamination probably caused by flyspecks and ice crystals. Wing divergence appears controllable by a combination of various methods. Wind-mounted superfans with extensive laminar flow on their nacelles appear practical. Their dominant tone noise is below the frequency range of the most strongly amplified TS-waves.

Key concepts: Laminar flow, Nacelle, Fuselage, Turbulence, Wing, Leading edge, Range (aeronautics), Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Long-range LFC transport — Research Paper | ScholarLens