1995Unpublished venueRequires access

CHAPTER 8. ROAD PRICING OR TRANSPORT PLANNING

P B Goodwin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter considers the case for the alternatives to road pricing. The main reason for doing so is that the case may be stronger than has been allowed for but even if it is not, it may be necessary to build on the alternatives if the implementation of road pricing is delayed for one reason or another. Two competing arguments are first put forward: the economist's case for road pricing and the transport planner's case for an alternative package of policies. It is suggested that road pricing is not the most important tool. The interaction between road pricing and other methods is then considered. The nature of the benefits of road pricing and how they can be distributed are discussed. Balanced transport policies with and without road pricing are compared. The involvement of the private sector and the constrast between the urban and interurban situation are discussed. For the covering abstract see IRRD 869545.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter considers the case for the alternatives to road pricing. The main reason for doing so is that the case may be stronger than has been allowed for but even if it is not, it may be necessary to build on the alternatives if the implementation of road pricing is delayed for one reason or another. Two competing arguments are first put forward: the economist's case for road pricing and the transport planner's case for an alternative package of policies. It is suggested that road pricing is not the most important tool. The interaction between road pricing and other methods is then considered. The nature of the benefits of road pricing and how they can be distributed are discussed. Balanced transport policies with and without road pricing are compared. The involvement of the private sector and the constrast between the urban and interurban situation are discussed. For the covering abstract see IRRD 869545.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter considers the case for the alternatives to road pricing. The main reason for doing so is that the case may be stronger than has been allowed for but even if it is not, it may be necessary to build on the alternatives if the implementation of road pricing is delayed for one reason or another. Two competing arguments are first put forward: the economist's case for road pricing and the transport planner's case for an alternative package of policies. It is suggested that road pricing is not the most important tool. The interaction between road pricing and other methods is then considered. The nature of the benefits of road pricing and how they can be distributed are discussed. Balanced transport policies with and without road pricing are compared. The involvement of the private sector and the constrast between the urban and interurban situation are discussed. For the covering abstract see IRRD 869545.

Key concepts: Road pricing, Interurban, Planner, Transport economics, Road transport, Transport engineering, Singapore Area Licensing Scheme, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CHAPTER 8. ROAD PRICING OR TRANSPORT PLANNING — Research Paper | ScholarLens