Effect of Different Milling Methods on Distribution of Particle Size of Rice Flours
Jun-Seok Kum, Sang-Hyo Lee, Hyun-Yu Lee, Kilhwan Kim, Young-In Kim
Abstract
Jun-Seok Kum, Sang-Hyo Lee, Hyun-Yu Lee, Kilhwan Kim, Young-In Kim
Abstract
Two different methods (Sieve shaker, Elzone particle size analyzer) were used to investigate rice flour particle size obtained by various milling method. Results of Elzone particle size analyzer were more effective than Sieve shaker in determining particle size, and the distribution of particle size of rice flours was affected by the type of the milling methods used. A rice flour, prepared in a Pin mill had a particle size range of mesh, and 30.38% of the sample was in the particle size range mesh. A rice flour, prepared in a Colloid mill had a particle size range of mesh and more of flour particles appeared in the range mesh than any other particle size. A rice flour, prepared in a Micro mill had a particle size range of mesh, and 41.62% of the sample was in the particle size range over 500 mesh. A rife flour, prepared in a Jet mill had a finer flour particle size was over the particle size range 500 mesh. The finer rice flour gave the highest L value and the lowest a value. The wet-milled flour particles were observed as a cluster of starch granules and the particles of rice flour (dry-milling) were observed as fragment of rice grains. Scanning Electron Photomicrographs revealed that visual differences in structure between milling methods, and similar results with Elzone particle size analyzer method in particle size.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two different methods (Sieve shaker, Elzone particle size analyzer) were used to investigate rice flour particle size obtained by various milling method. Results of Elzone particle size analyzer were more effective than Sieve shaker in determining particle size, and the distribution of particle size of rice flours was affected by the type of the milling methods used. A rice flour, prepared in a Pin mill had a particle size range of mesh, and 30.38% of the sample was in the particle size range mesh. A rice flour, prepared in a Colloid mill had a particle size range of mesh and more of flour particles appeared in the range mesh than any other particle size. A rice flour, prepared in a Micro mill had a particle size range of mesh, and 41.62% of the sample was in the particle size range over 500 mesh. A rife flour, prepared in a Jet mill had a finer flour particle size was over the particle size range 500 mesh. The finer rice flour gave the highest L value and the lowest a value. The wet-milled flour particles were observed as a cluster of starch granules and the particles of rice flour (dry-milling) were observed as fragment of rice grains. Scanning Electron Photomicrographs revealed that visual differences in structure between milling methods, and similar results with Elzone particle size analyzer method in particle size.
Key concepts: Particle size, Sieve (category theory), Materials science, Particle-size distribution, Particle (ecology), Sieve analysis, Starch, Rice flour