1993•PsychobiologyOpen access

Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists flumazenil and CGS 8216 and inverse-agonist β-CCM nhance spatial learning in the rat: Dissociation from anxiogenic actions

Robert K. McNamara, Ronald W. Skelton

Open full text 30 citations

Abstract

The effects of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonists flumazenil (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg) and CGS 8216 (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg), the benzodiazepine receptor inverse-agonist methyl β-carboline-3-carboxylate (β-CCM; 0.3, 0.6, and 1.0 mg/kg), and the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam (3 mg/kg) were investigated on spatial learning in the Morris water maze and thigmotaxia in an open field. Flumazenil, CGS 8216, and β-CCM dose-dependently enhanced spatial learning, whereas diazepam impaired it. Flumazenil (10 mg/kg) antagonized both the enhancement produced by β-CCM (0.3 mg/kg) and the impairment produced by diazepam. The impairment produced by diazepam was not blocked by β-CCM (0.3 mg/kg). In the open field, flumazenil, CGS 8216, and β-CCM dose-dependently increased thigmotaxia (anxiogenesis), whereas diazepam had no effect. Flumazenil (10 mg/kg) blocked the anxiogenic effect of β-CCM (0.6 mg/kg) and increased anxiety when combined with diazepam; the anxiogenic effect of β-CCM (0.6 mg/kg) was not antagonized by diazepam. Since the dose-response profiles of flumazenil, CGS 8216, and β-CCM on spatial learning and thigmotaxia were highly dissimilar, it is unlikely that the mnemonic-enhancing actions of these drugs are due to their anxiogenic actions.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effects of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonists flumazenil (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg) and CGS 8216 (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg), the benzodiazepine receptor inverse-agonist methyl β-carboline-3-carboxylate (β-CCM; 0.3, 0.6, and 1.0 mg/kg), and the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam (3 mg/kg) were investigated on spatial learning in the Morris water maze and thigmotaxia in an open field. Flumazenil, CGS 8216, and β-CCM dose-dependently enhanced spatial learning, whereas diazepam impaired it. Flumazenil (10 mg/kg) antagonized both the enhancement produced by β-CCM (0.3 mg/kg) and the impairment produced by diazepam. The impairment produced by diazepam was not blocked by β-CCM (0.3 mg/kg). In the open field, flumazenil, CGS 8216, and β-CCM dose-dependently increased thigmotaxia (anxiogenesis), whereas diazepam had no effect. Flumazenil (10 mg/kg) blocked the anxiogenic effect of β-CCM (0.6 mg/kg) and increased anxiety when combined with diazepam; the anxiogenic effect of β-CCM (0.6 mg/kg) was not antagonized by diazepam. Since the dose-response profiles of flumazenil, CGS 8216, and β-CCM on spatial learning and thigmotaxia were highly dissimilar, it is unlikely that the mnemonic-enhancing actions of these drugs are due to their anxiogenic actions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effects of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonists flumazenil (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg) and CGS 8216 (10, 20, and 30 mg/kg), the benzodiazepine receptor inverse-agonist methyl β-carboline-3-carboxylate (β-CCM; 0.3, 0.6, and 1.0 mg/kg), and the benzodiazepine receptor agonist diazepam (3 mg/kg) were investigated on spatial learning in the Morris water maze and thigmotaxia in an open field. Flumazenil, CGS 8216, and β-CCM dose-dependently enhanced spatial learning, whereas diazepam impaired it. Flumazenil (10 mg/kg) antagonized both the enhancement produced by β-CCM (0.3 mg/kg) and the impairment produced by diazepam. The impairment produced by diazepam was not blocked by β-CCM (0.3 mg/kg). In the open field, flumazenil, CGS 8216, and β-CCM dose-dependently increased thigmotaxia (anxiogenesis), whereas diazepam had no effect. Flumazenil (10 mg/kg) blocked the anxiogenic effect of β-CCM (0.6 mg/kg) and increased anxiety when combined with diazepam; the anxiogenic effect of β-CCM (0.6 mg/kg) was not antagonized by diazepam. Since the dose-response profiles of flumazenil, CGS 8216, and β-CCM on spatial learning and thigmotaxia were highly dissimilar, it is unlikely that the mnemonic-enhancing actions of these drugs are due to their anxiogenic actions.

Key concepts: Flumazenil, Anxiogenic, Inverse agonist, Benzodiazepine, Diazepam, Chemistry, Agonist, Pharmacology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists flumazenil and CGS 8216 and inverse-agonist β-CCM nhance spatial learning in the rat: Dissociation from anxiogenic actions — Research Paper | ScholarLens