2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Summary of the Alterations

Philip Handyside

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In conclusion, the translator's omission of many passages of William of Tyre's Latin Historia relating to ecclesiastical and classical material would suggest that he was writing primarily for a lay audience. The translator himself is likely to have been a cleric. Aside from his ability to make the translation accurately from Latin, he seems to have had a relation to the Augustinian canons. The alterations are found in all the early manuscripts that parallel the Latin most closely and would therefore appear to have been the work of the translator. There are a number of significant variants that were introduced into the manuscript tradition after the original translation. The remainder of this book explores the development of the manuscript tradition for the Eracles text through an examination of sample chapters that an initial enquiry showed to contain significant variant readings.Keywords: Augustinian canons; Eracles text; manuscript tradition; William of Tyre's Latin Historia

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In conclusion, the translator's omission of many passages of William of Tyre's Latin Historia relating to ecclesiastical and classical material would suggest that he was writing primarily for a lay audience. The translator himself is likely to have been a cleric. Aside from his ability to make the translation accurately from Latin, he seems to have had a relation to the Augustinian canons. The alterations are found in all the early manuscripts that parallel the Latin most closely and would therefore appear to have been the work of the translator. There are a number of significant variants that were introduced into the manuscript tradition after the original translation. The remainder of this book explores the development of the manuscript tradition for the Eracles text through an examination of sample chapters that an initial enquiry showed to contain significant variant readings.Keywords: Augustinian canons; Eracles text; manuscript tradition; William of Tyre's Latin Historia

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In conclusion, the translator's omission of many passages of William of Tyre's Latin Historia relating to ecclesiastical and classical material would suggest that he was writing primarily for a lay audience. The translator himself is likely to have been a cleric. Aside from his ability to make the translation accurately from Latin, he seems to have had a relation to the Augustinian canons. The alterations are found in all the early manuscripts that parallel the Latin most closely and would therefore appear to have been the work of the translator. There are a number of significant variants that were introduced into the manuscript tradition after the original translation. The remainder of this book explores the development of the manuscript tradition for the Eracles text through an examination of sample chapters that an initial enquiry showed to contain significant variant readings.Keywords: Augustinian canons; Eracles text; manuscript tradition; William of Tyre's Latin Historia

Key concepts: History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Summary of the Alterations — Research Paper | ScholarLens