2017•Unpublished venueRequires access

The Containerization Story: Meeting the Competition in Trade

Paul Wesley Chilcote

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

During the 1950s, the United States was at a crossroad in trade policy. Confronting the nation at the time was the question of whether to return to pre-World War II trade barriers that would safely confine the economy, or to embrace an emerging world economy based on international trade. The most far-reaching advance in marine technology development in the past thirty years has been in containerized general cargo shipping. This chapter focuses on the development of container shipping and its impact on ports, the port authority, and connecting land transportation. Before the advent of containerization, a general cargo vessel would typically spend approximately half its life in port. A container vessel that has a set itinerary of a few selected ports faces quite different operational criteria than a breakbulk ship. On the East Coast, The Port of New York/New Jersey was quick to anticipate the potential in container terminal development.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During the 1950s, the United States was at a crossroad in trade policy. Confronting the nation at the time was the question of whether to return to pre-World War II trade barriers that would safely confine the economy, or to embrace an emerging world economy based on international trade. The most far-reaching advance in marine technology development in the past thirty years has been in containerized general cargo shipping. This chapter focuses on the development of container shipping and its impact on ports, the port authority, and connecting land transportation. Before the advent of containerization, a general cargo vessel would typically spend approximately half its life in port. A container vessel that has a set itinerary of a few selected ports faces quite different operational criteria than a breakbulk ship. On the East Coast, The Port of New York/New Jersey was quick to anticipate the potential in container terminal development.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During the 1950s, the United States was at a crossroad in trade policy. Confronting the nation at the time was the question of whether to return to pre-World War II trade barriers that would safely confine the economy, or to embrace an emerging world economy based on international trade. The most far-reaching advance in marine technology development in the past thirty years has been in containerized general cargo shipping. This chapter focuses on the development of container shipping and its impact on ports, the port authority, and connecting land transportation. Before the advent of containerization, a general cargo vessel would typically spend approximately half its life in port. A container vessel that has a set itinerary of a few selected ports faces quite different operational criteria than a breakbulk ship. On the East Coast, The Port of New York/New Jersey was quick to anticipate the potential in container terminal development.

Key concepts: Containerization, Competition (biology), International trade, Business, Engineering, Container (type theory), Biology, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Containerization Story: Meeting the Competition in Trade — Research Paper | ScholarLens