1969Unpublished venueRequires access

INTERSECTION DELAY AND LEFT TURN PHASING

G Gurnett

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS THE ROAD DEPARTMENT AND OTHER AGENCIES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY HAVE INSTALLED MINOR MOVEMENT LEFT TURN PHASING AT NUMEROUS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS. WHEN TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS INCREASE, THE PROBLEM OF PROVIDING LEFT TURN PROTECTION SIMILARLY INCREASES. THREE LOCATIONS ARE ANALYZED AFTER DELAY STUDIES ARE USED TO FIND HOW MUCH INTERSECTION DELAY INCREASED AFTER LEFT TURN PHASING WAS INSTALLED. CONCLUSIONS INDICATED THAT: (1) INTERSECTION DELAY PER VEHICLE SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASED FROM 22% TO 121% AFTER LEFT PHASING WAS INSTALLED, (2) PEAK HOUR DELAY MAY INCREASE OVER 100% AFTER LEFT TURN PHASING IS INSTALLED ON ALL APPROACHES OF THE INTERSECTION, (3) LEFT TURN DELAY IS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED BY LEFT TURN PHASING, AND (4) NORMALLY, INTERSECTION DELAY COSTS OUTWEIGH ACCIDENT REDUCTION SAVINGS, BUT ACCIDENT SAVINGS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL INTERSECTION. /AUTHOR/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS THE ROAD DEPARTMENT AND OTHER AGENCIES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY HAVE INSTALLED MINOR MOVEMENT LEFT TURN PHASING AT NUMEROUS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS. WHEN TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS INCREASE, THE PROBLEM OF PROVIDING LEFT TURN PROTECTION SIMILARLY INCREASES. THREE LOCATIONS ARE ANALYZED AFTER DELAY STUDIES ARE USED TO FIND HOW MUCH INTERSECTION DELAY INCREASED AFTER LEFT TURN PHASING WAS INSTALLED. CONCLUSIONS INDICATED THAT: (1) INTERSECTION DELAY PER VEHICLE SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASED FROM 22% TO 121% AFTER LEFT PHASING WAS INSTALLED, (2) PEAK HOUR DELAY MAY INCREASE OVER 100% AFTER LEFT TURN PHASING IS INSTALLED ON ALL APPROACHES OF THE INTERSECTION, (3) LEFT TURN DELAY IS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED BY LEFT TURN PHASING, AND (4) NORMALLY, INTERSECTION DELAY COSTS OUTWEIGH ACCIDENT REDUCTION SAVINGS, BUT ACCIDENT SAVINGS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL INTERSECTION. /AUTHOR/

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS THE ROAD DEPARTMENT AND OTHER AGENCIES IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY HAVE INSTALLED MINOR MOVEMENT LEFT TURN PHASING AT NUMEROUS SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS. WHEN TRAFFIC VOLUMES AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS INCREASE, THE PROBLEM OF PROVIDING LEFT TURN PROTECTION SIMILARLY INCREASES. THREE LOCATIONS ARE ANALYZED AFTER DELAY STUDIES ARE USED TO FIND HOW MUCH INTERSECTION DELAY INCREASED AFTER LEFT TURN PHASING WAS INSTALLED. CONCLUSIONS INDICATED THAT: (1) INTERSECTION DELAY PER VEHICLE SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASED FROM 22% TO 121% AFTER LEFT PHASING WAS INSTALLED, (2) PEAK HOUR DELAY MAY INCREASE OVER 100% AFTER LEFT TURN PHASING IS INSTALLED ON ALL APPROACHES OF THE INTERSECTION, (3) LEFT TURN DELAY IS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED BY LEFT TURN PHASING, AND (4) NORMALLY, INTERSECTION DELAY COSTS OUTWEIGH ACCIDENT REDUCTION SAVINGS, BUT ACCIDENT SAVINGS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL INTERSECTION. /AUTHOR/

Key concepts: Phaser, Intersection (aeronautics), Turn (biochemistry), Transport engineering, Mathematics, Engineering, Physics, Electrical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
INTERSECTION DELAY AND LEFT TURN PHASING — Research Paper | ScholarLens