2007Unpublished venueRequires access

"Authorized Guardians": The Polemics Of Academic Scholars Of Jewish Mysticism Against Kabbalah Practitioners

Boaz Huss

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

In this chapter the author examines the polemics of academic scholars against contemporary kabbalah practitioners, and analyzes its social and cultural significance. He suggests that the polemical stance of these academic scholars is an expression of the ideological and theological perspective of scholars engaged in the field of Jewish mysticism, who aspire not only to study kabbalah as a historical and sociological phenomenon, but also to determine its symbolic value and control its increasing cultural capital in the modern world. He claims that the polemics of the modern scholars against contemporary kabbalists is an expression of their claim to be the authorized guardians of kabbalah in the modern world. Following the growing interest in kabbalah in non-Jewish European culture, Jewish intellectuals in both Western and Eastern Europe reaffirmed the value of kabbalah and Hasidism.Keywords: Jewish mysticism; jewish thinkers; kabbalah; Polemics

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this chapter the author examines the polemics of academic scholars against contemporary kabbalah practitioners, and analyzes its social and cultural significance. He suggests that the polemical stance of these academic scholars is an expression of the ideological and theological perspective of scholars engaged in the field of Jewish mysticism, who aspire not only to study kabbalah as a historical and sociological phenomenon, but also to determine its symbolic value and control its increasing cultural capital in the modern world. He claims that the polemics of the modern scholars against contemporary kabbalists is an expression of their claim to be the authorized guardians of kabbalah in the modern world. Following the growing interest in kabbalah in non-Jewish European culture, Jewish intellectuals in both Western and Eastern Europe reaffirmed the value of kabbalah and Hasidism.Keywords: Jewish mysticism; jewish thinkers; kabbalah; Polemics

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this chapter the author examines the polemics of academic scholars against contemporary kabbalah practitioners, and analyzes its social and cultural significance. He suggests that the polemical stance of these academic scholars is an expression of the ideological and theological perspective of scholars engaged in the field of Jewish mysticism, who aspire not only to study kabbalah as a historical and sociological phenomenon, but also to determine its symbolic value and control its increasing cultural capital in the modern world. He claims that the polemics of the modern scholars against contemporary kabbalists is an expression of their claim to be the authorized guardians of kabbalah in the modern world. Following the growing interest in kabbalah in non-Jewish European culture, Jewish intellectuals in both Western and Eastern Europe reaffirmed the value of kabbalah and Hasidism.Keywords: Jewish mysticism; jewish thinkers; kabbalah; Polemics

Key concepts: Kabbalah, Jewish mysticism, Judaism, Mysticism, Value (mathematics), Ideology, Religious studies, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
"Authorized Guardians": The Polemics Of Academic Scholars Of Jewish Mysticism Against Kabbalah Practitioners — Research Paper | ScholarLens