Research requirements for bridge deck expansion joints
B. Pritchard
Abstract
B. Pritchard
Abstract
Abstract Any typ e of join t i s a potential sourc e of weakness. Modern concret e an d stee l bridges have joint s t o accommodate th e movements o f the bridge deck relative t o the adjacent pavement. Many o f these joint s leak , allowing water an d chloride s t o penetrate dec k ends , abutments, piers an d crosshead s an d caus e corrosion o f the reinforcing steel . The performance o f current joint s is very variable. Som e are satisfactory, bu t many hav e service live s of only a few years an d ar e expensive t o maintain.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Any typ e of join t i s a potential sourc e of weakness. Modern concret e an d stee l bridges have joint s t o accommodate th e movements o f the bridge deck relative t o the adjacent pavement. Many o f these joint s leak , allowing water an d chloride s t o penetrate dec k ends , abutments, piers an d crosshead s an d caus e corrosion o f the reinforcing steel . The performance o f current joint s is very variable. Som e are satisfactory, bu t many hav e service live s of only a few years an d ar e expensive t o maintain.
Key concepts: Expansion joint, Bridge (graph theory), Structural engineering, Deck, Bridge deck, Engineering, Computer science, Forensic engineering