Joel M Lemuel
Abstract
Open-access reader
This study examines the analyzes the 2010 National Tea Party Convention in order to determine whether the Tea Party Movements? rhetoric is unique from the rhetoric employed by previously studied movements. The study forwards the concept of a pseudo-movement: a movement that appears radical, but has normative, procedural goals.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study examines the analyzes the 2010 National Tea Party Convention in order to determine whether the Tea Party Movements? rhetoric is unique from the rhetoric employed by previously studied movements. The study forwards the concept of a pseudo-movement: a movement that appears radical, but has normative, procedural goals.
Key concepts: Rhetoric, Movement (music), Normative, Social movement, Convention, Tea party, Political science, Sociology