1970•NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA)Open access

A discussion of the modes of failure of bumper-hull structures with application to the meteoroid hazard

C. R. Nysmith

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The impact of double-sheet structures is discussed, and typical impact-performance curves, determined by the physical processes by which the rear sheet fails, are defined.It is concluded that, in order for a bumper-hull system to perform effectively, the front-and rear-sheet thicknesses must be larger than certain minimum limits.Tentative values for these limits are: the front sheet should be thicker than 0.25 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; the rear sheet should be thicker than 0.50 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; and the rear sheet should be thicker than the front sheet.Also, it is concluded that if the sheet-thickness ratios are selected according to both high-and low-speed results (observing the above thickness-ratio minimums), and the sheet spacing is selected according to low-speed results, the structure will pcrform satisfactorily for all probable impact conditions.17.Key Words (Suggested by Authorb)) Hypervelocity impact Meteoroid hazard Meteor bumper Impact phenomena 18. Distribution Statement Unclassified -Unlimited 19.Security Classif.(of this report) 22. Price' 21.NO. of Pages 20.Security Classif.(of this page)

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The impact of double-sheet structures is discussed, and typical impact-performance curves, determined by the physical processes by which the rear sheet fails, are defined.It is concluded that, in order for a bumper-hull system to perform effectively, the front-and rear-sheet thicknesses must be larger than certain minimum limits.Tentative values for these limits are: the front sheet should be thicker than 0.25 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; the rear sheet should be thicker than 0.50 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; and the rear sheet should be thicker than the front sheet.Also, it is concluded that if the sheet-thickness ratios are selected according to both high-and low-speed results (observing the above thickness-ratio minimums), and the sheet spacing is selected according to low-speed results, the structure will pcrform satisfactorily for all probable impact conditions.17.Key Words (Suggested by Authorb)) Hypervelocity impact Meteoroid hazard Meteor bumper Impact phenomena 18. Distribution Statement Unclassified -Unlimited 19.Security Classif.(of this report) 22. Price' 21.NO. of Pages 20.Security Classif.(of this page)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The impact of double-sheet structures is discussed, and typical impact-performance curves, determined by the physical processes by which the rear sheet fails, are defined.It is concluded that, in order for a bumper-hull system to perform effectively, the front-and rear-sheet thicknesses must be larger than certain minimum limits.Tentative values for these limits are: the front sheet should be thicker than 0.25 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; the rear sheet should be thicker than 0.50 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; and the rear sheet should be thicker than the front sheet.Also, it is concluded that if the sheet-thickness ratios are selected according to both high-and low-speed results (observing the above thickness-ratio minimums), and the sheet spacing is selected according to low-speed results, the structure will pcrform satisfactorily for all probable impact conditions.17.Key Words (Suggested by Authorb)) Hypervelocity impact Meteoroid hazard Meteor bumper Impact phenomena 18. Distribution Statement Unclassified -Unlimited 19.Security Classif.(of this report) 22. Price' 21.NO. of Pages 20.Security Classif.(of this page)

Key concepts: Meteoroid, Hull, Hazard, Forensic engineering, Astrobiology, Engineering, Physics, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A discussion of the modes of failure of bumper-hull structures with application to the meteoroid hazard — Research Paper | ScholarLens