A discussion of the modes of failure of bumper-hull structures with application to the meteoroid hazard
C. R. Nysmith
Abstract
Open-access reader
C. R. Nysmith
Abstract
Open-access reader
The impact of double-sheet structures is discussed, and typical impact-performance curves, determined by the physical processes by which the rear sheet fails, are defined.It is concluded that, in order for a bumper-hull system to perform effectively, the front-and rear-sheet thicknesses must be larger than certain minimum limits.Tentative values for these limits are: the front sheet should be thicker than 0.25 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; the rear sheet should be thicker than 0.50 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; and the rear sheet should be thicker than the front sheet.Also, it is concluded that if the sheet-thickness ratios are selected according to both high-and low-speed results (observing the above thickness-ratio minimums), and the sheet spacing is selected according to low-speed results, the structure will pcrform satisfactorily for all probable impact conditions.17.Key Words (Suggested by Authorb)) Hypervelocity impact Meteoroid hazard Meteor bumper Impact phenomena 18. Distribution Statement Unclassified -Unlimited 19.Security Classif.(of this report) 22. Price' 21.NO. of Pages 20.Security Classif.(of this page)
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The impact of double-sheet structures is discussed, and typical impact-performance curves, determined by the physical processes by which the rear sheet fails, are defined.It is concluded that, in order for a bumper-hull system to perform effectively, the front-and rear-sheet thicknesses must be larger than certain minimum limits.Tentative values for these limits are: the front sheet should be thicker than 0.25 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; the rear sheet should be thicker than 0.50 times the diameter of the largest probable meteoroid; and the rear sheet should be thicker than the front sheet.Also, it is concluded that if the sheet-thickness ratios are selected according to both high-and low-speed results (observing the above thickness-ratio minimums), and the sheet spacing is selected according to low-speed results, the structure will pcrform satisfactorily for all probable impact conditions.17.Key Words (Suggested by Authorb)) Hypervelocity impact Meteoroid hazard Meteor bumper Impact phenomena 18. Distribution Statement Unclassified -Unlimited 19.Security Classif.(of this report) 22. Price' 21.NO. of Pages 20.Security Classif.(of this page)
Key concepts: Meteoroid, Hull, Hazard, Forensic engineering, Astrobiology, Engineering, Physics, Chemistry