1995The Indian Journal of Animal SciencesOpen access

Livestock as a source of income in rural areas

Parmatma Singh, Chhavi Tiwari

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The potential of livestock in generating income on farms was investigated. For this the livestock  owners of the villages Atta (south) and Atta (north) of Bareilly district were selected. Information on different livestock products such as milk and dung, and values of draught power and agricultural products were collected for these livestock households from July 1989 to June 1992. Livestock contributed about one-third of the lotal income from agriculture including livestock. The farmers with small holdings hild large number of livestock while those with large farm holdings possessed proportionately small number of livestock. The skewed distribution is mainly responsible for under-utili zation of the livestock resources. Marginal farmers were more benefited from livestock on per household basis from milk. and draught power, Large and medium farmers received more income from milk as they were endowed with better milch cows and buffaloes. The use of bullocks and he buffaloes for fann work was mainly confined to marginal, small and medium households. Large farmers often used mechanical power for farm work. The results suggested that livestock offers a promising scope. For better and balanced development of livestock enterprise for the benefit of landless, marginal and small households, livestock needs attention of policy makers, planners and central and state governments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The potential of livestock in generating income on farms was investigated. For this the livestock  owners of the villages Atta (south) and Atta (north) of Bareilly district were selected. Information on different livestock products such as milk and dung, and values of draught power and agricultural products were collected for these livestock households from July 1989 to June 1992. Livestock contributed about one-third of the lotal income from agriculture including livestock. The farmers with small holdings hild large number of livestock while those with large farm holdings possessed proportionately small number of livestock. The skewed distribution is mainly responsible for under-utili zation of the livestock resources. Marginal farmers were more benefited from livestock on per household basis from milk. and draught power, Large and medium farmers received more income from milk as they were endowed with better milch cows and buffaloes. The use of bullocks and he buffaloes for fann work was mainly confined to marginal, small and medium households. Large farmers often used mechanical power for farm work. The results suggested that livestock offers a promising scope. For better and balanced development of livestock enterprise for the benefit of landless, marginal and small households, livestock needs attention of policy makers, planners and central and state governments.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The potential of livestock in generating income on farms was investigated. For this the livestock  owners of the villages Atta (south) and Atta (north) of Bareilly district were selected. Information on different livestock products such as milk and dung, and values of draught power and agricultural products were collected for these livestock households from July 1989 to June 1992. Livestock contributed about one-third of the lotal income from agriculture including livestock. The farmers with small holdings hild large number of livestock while those with large farm holdings possessed proportionately small number of livestock. The skewed distribution is mainly responsible for under-utili zation of the livestock resources. Marginal farmers were more benefited from livestock on per household basis from milk. and draught power, Large and medium farmers received more income from milk as they were endowed with better milch cows and buffaloes. The use of bullocks and he buffaloes for fann work was mainly confined to marginal, small and medium households. Large farmers often used mechanical power for farm work. The results suggested that livestock offers a promising scope. For better and balanced development of livestock enterprise for the benefit of landless, marginal and small households, livestock needs attention of policy makers, planners and central and state governments.

Key concepts: Livestock, Agriculture, Agricultural science, Business, Work (physics), Agricultural economics, Geography, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Livestock as a source of income in rural areas — Research Paper | ScholarLens