2011•PubMedRequires access

[Comparison of tone burst evoked auditory brainstem responses with different filter settings for referral infants after hearing screening].

Wen-wen Diao, Dao-feng Ni, Feng-rong Li, Yingying Shang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) evoked by tone burst is an important method of hearing assessment in referral infants after hearing screening. The present study was to compare the thresholds of tone burst ABR with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz and 30 - 3000 Hz at each frequency, figure out the characteristics of ABR thresholds with the two filter settings and the effect of the waveform judgement, so as to select a more optimal frequency specific ABR test parameter. METHODS: Thresholds with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz and 30 - 3000 Hz in children aged 2 - 33 months were recorded by click, tone burst ABR. A total of 18 patients (8 male/10 female), 22 ears were included. RESULTS: The thresholds of tone burst ABR with filter settings of 30 - 3000 Hz were higher than that with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz. Significant difference was detected for that at 0.5 kHz and 2.0 kHz (t values were 2.238 and 2.217, P < 0.05), no significant difference between the two filter settings was detected at the rest frequencies tone evoked ABR thresholds. The waveform of ABR with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz was smoother than that with filter settings of 30 - 3000 Hz at the same stimulus intensity. Response curve of the latter appeared jagged small interfering wave. CONCLUSIONS: The filter setting of 30 - 1500 Hz may be a more optimal parameter of frequency specific ABR to improve the accuracy of frequency specificity ABR for infants' hearing assessment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) evoked by tone burst is an important method of hearing assessment in referral infants after hearing screening. The present study was to compare the thresholds of tone burst ABR with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz and 30 - 3000 Hz at each frequency, figure out the characteristics of ABR thresholds with the two filter settings and the effect of the waveform judgement, so as to select a more optimal frequency specific ABR test parameter. METHODS: Thresholds with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz and 30 - 3000 Hz in children aged 2 - 33 months were recorded by click, tone burst ABR. A total of 18 patients (8 male/10 female), 22 ears were included. RESULTS: The thresholds of tone burst ABR with filter settings of 30 - 3000 Hz were higher than that with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz. Significant difference was detected for that at 0.5 kHz and 2.0 kHz (t values were 2.238 and 2.217, P < 0.05), no significant difference between the two filter settings was detected at the rest frequencies tone evoked ABR thresholds. The waveform of ABR with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz was smoother than that with filter settings of 30 - 3000 Hz at the same stimulus intensity. Response curve of the latter appeared jagged small interfering wave. CONCLUSIONS: The filter setting of 30 - 1500 Hz may be a more optimal parameter of frequency specific ABR to improve the accuracy of frequency specificity ABR for infants' hearing assessment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) evoked by tone burst is an important method of hearing assessment in referral infants after hearing screening. The present study was to compare the thresholds of tone burst ABR with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz and 30 - 3000 Hz at each frequency, figure out the characteristics of ABR thresholds with the two filter settings and the effect of the waveform judgement, so as to select a more optimal frequency specific ABR test parameter. METHODS: Thresholds with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz and 30 - 3000 Hz in children aged 2 - 33 months were recorded by click, tone burst ABR. A total of 18 patients (8 male/10 female), 22 ears were included. RESULTS: The thresholds of tone burst ABR with filter settings of 30 - 3000 Hz were higher than that with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz. Significant difference was detected for that at 0.5 kHz and 2.0 kHz (t values were 2.238 and 2.217, P < 0.05), no significant difference between the two filter settings was detected at the rest frequencies tone evoked ABR thresholds. The waveform of ABR with filter settings of 30 - 1500 Hz was smoother than that with filter settings of 30 - 3000 Hz at the same stimulus intensity. Response curve of the latter appeared jagged small interfering wave. CONCLUSIONS: The filter setting of 30 - 1500 Hz may be a more optimal parameter of frequency specific ABR to improve the accuracy of frequency specificity ABR for infants' hearing assessment.

Key concepts: Audiology, Medicine, Tone burst, Auditory brainstem response, Audiometry, Filter (signal processing), Stimulus (psychology), Acoustics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Comparison of tone burst evoked auditory brainstem responses with different filter settings for referral infants after hearing screening]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens