Evaluation of non-freeway rumble strips - phase II.
Tapan K Datta, Peter T. Savolainen, Timothy J. Gates, Jonathan J. Kay, Nicholas B Nicita, Sahadev Parajuli, Jacob Finkelman
Abstract
Tapan K Datta, Peter T. Savolainen, Timothy J. Gates, Jonathan J. Kay, Nicholas B Nicita, Sahadev Parajuli, Jacob Finkelman
Abstract
Michigan Department of Transportation's (MDOT’s) rumble strip program for two-lane high speed rural highways was initiated in 2008 and continued through 2010. This program included implementation of centerline rumble strips (CLRS) on nearly 5,400 miles of two-lane high speed roads that MDOT maintains. This program presented an opportunity to perform a comprehensive evaluation of safety performance of rumble strips, especially CLRS. A two-phase evaluation study of the program was launched to estimate the driver behavioral and performance improvement in the presence of CLRS on two-lane high speed highways and also perform a system-wide “Before” and “After” study of target traffic crashes. The driver behavior-related study and collection of the three years’ “Before” crash data and analysis was performed in Phase I (OR09084A) and the Phase II study was performed to collect the three years of “After” crash data, a program evaluation study, and benefit-cost analysis. The crash analysis indicated statistically significant reductions in all target crashes including, head-on, sideswipe opposite and run-off-the-road left. The study of crashes and their severity resulted in the reduction in fatal and all categories of injury crashes including a 47% reduction in total target crashes and a 51% reduction in target fatal crashes. An economic analysis of the rumble strip program resulted in a benefit-cost ratio of the program to be in the range of 58:1 to 18:1 based on discount rate assumptions of 2% and 10%, respectively. A road user survey indicated strong agreement among the respondents that CLRS is a beneficial safety improvement program.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Michigan Department of Transportation's (MDOT’s) rumble strip program for two-lane high speed rural highways was initiated in 2008 and continued through 2010. This program included implementation of centerline rumble strips (CLRS) on nearly 5,400 miles of two-lane high speed roads that MDOT maintains. This program presented an opportunity to perform a comprehensive evaluation of safety performance of rumble strips, especially CLRS. A two-phase evaluation study of the program was launched to estimate the driver behavioral and performance improvement in the presence of CLRS on two-lane high speed highways and also perform a system-wide “Before” and “After” study of target traffic crashes. The driver behavior-related study and collection of the three years’ “Before” crash data and analysis was performed in Phase I (OR09084A) and the Phase II study was performed to collect the three years of “After” crash data, a program evaluation study, and benefit-cost analysis. The crash analysis indicated statistically significant reductions in all target crashes including, head-on, sideswipe opposite and run-off-the-road left. The study of crashes and their severity resulted in the reduction in fatal and all categories of injury crashes including a 47% reduction in total target crashes and a 51% reduction in target fatal crashes. An economic analysis of the rumble strip program resulted in a benefit-cost ratio of the program to be in the range of 58:1 to 18:1 based on discount rate assumptions of 2% and 10%, respectively. A road user survey indicated strong agreement among the respondents that CLRS is a beneficial safety improvement program.
Key concepts: Rumble, Transport engineering, Crash, Data collection, Truck, Motor vehicle crash, Engineering, Poison control