2015•BMJRequires access

Supreme Court rejects challenge to Affordable Care Act

Michael McCarthy

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The US Supreme Court has rejected by six votes to three a challenge to the Affordable Care Act that, had it succeeded, threatened to upend the 2010 health legislation.1 In the challenge four plaintiffs had argued that the law did not authorize the US Internal Revenue Service to use tax credits to subsidize premiums for health insurance plans purchased through the health exchange run by the federal government, HealthCare.gov. The challenge focused on a six word phrase in the 900 page law that authorized tax credits for premiums purchased through “an Exchange established by the State.”2 A plain reading of those words, the plaintiffs contended, authorizes tax credits for state run exchanges only, not for the exchange established by the federal government. Thirty six states decided not to set …

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The US Supreme Court has rejected by six votes to three a challenge to the Affordable Care Act that, had it succeeded, threatened to upend the 2010 health legislation.1 In the challenge four plaintiffs had argued that the law did not authorize the US Internal Revenue Service to use tax credits to subsidize premiums for health insurance plans purchased through the health exchange run by the federal government, HealthCare.gov. The challenge focused on a six word phrase in the 900 page law that authorized tax credits for premiums purchased through “an Exchange established by the State.”2 A plain reading of those words, the plaintiffs contended, authorizes tax credits for state run exchanges only, not for the exchange established by the federal government. Thirty six states decided not to set …

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The US Supreme Court has rejected by six votes to three a challenge to the Affordable Care Act that, had it succeeded, threatened to upend the 2010 health legislation.1 In the challenge four plaintiffs had argued that the law did not authorize the US Internal Revenue Service to use tax credits to subsidize premiums for health insurance plans purchased through the health exchange run by the federal government, HealthCare.gov. The challenge focused on a six word phrase in the 900 page law that authorized tax credits for premiums purchased through “an Exchange established by the State.”2 A plain reading of those words, the plaintiffs contended, authorizes tax credits for state run exchanges only, not for the exchange established by the federal government. Thirty six states decided not to set …

Key concepts: Supreme court, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Legislation, Business, Law, Plaintiff, Subsidy, Commerce Clause

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Supreme Court rejects challenge to Affordable Care Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens