2010•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

The self-use of talent

Leigh K. Jenco

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Zhang's interventions in the rule-by-man and rule-by-law debate expose the claims of his interlocutors based on these models as dangerously autocratic, yet his interventions do not fully set out the scope or nature of the kind of politics Zhang envisioned. “Self-awareness” models the structure into which individuals can be said to make meaningful, effective interventions in politics, but the concrete manifestations of self-awareness – why and how its cultivation may impact the shared environment – remain unspecified. This chapter begins to address these gaps by looking at what Zhang identifies as another of “the foundations of government” – namely the “self-use of talent” ( ziyong cai ). Zhang's invocation of talent as a political remedy is unusual for a democratic theory whose emphasis on equality tends to ignore or vilify the benefits accruing to expertise and natural ability. Talent is a concept invoked more commonly by late imperial Chinese officials, whose responses to political crisis often turned on the need for superiors to “find the [right] person” ( de qi ren ) with the necessary talents to execute particular tasks. Even in Chinese politics, how ever, talent is an ambiguous value. Sometimes associated with knowledge ( zhi ) but identified with activities as diverse as military strategy, literary composition, entrepreneurial ability, and mechanical craftsmanship, it tended to be seen either as unpredictable and potentially subversive, or as profoundly inefficacious, without proper regulation by virtue ( de ).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Zhang's interventions in the rule-by-man and rule-by-law debate expose the claims of his interlocutors based on these models as dangerously autocratic, yet his interventions do not fully set out the scope or nature of the kind of politics Zhang envisioned. “Self-awareness” models the structure into which individuals can be said to make meaningful, effective interventions in politics, but the concrete manifestations of self-awareness – why and how its cultivation may impact the shared environment – remain unspecified. This chapter begins to address these gaps by looking at what Zhang identifies as another of “the foundations of government” – namely the “self-use of talent” ( ziyong cai ). Zhang's invocation of talent as a political remedy is unusual for a democratic theory whose emphasis on equality tends to ignore or vilify the benefits accruing to expertise and natural ability. Talent is a concept invoked more commonly by late imperial Chinese officials, whose responses to political crisis often turned on the need for superiors to “find the [right] person” ( de qi ren ) with the necessary talents to execute particular tasks. Even in Chinese politics, how ever, talent is an ambiguous value. Sometimes associated with knowledge ( zhi ) but identified with activities as diverse as military strategy, literary composition, entrepreneurial ability, and mechanical craftsmanship, it tended to be seen either as unpredictable and potentially subversive, or as profoundly inefficacious, without proper regulation by virtue ( de ).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Zhang's interventions in the rule-by-man and rule-by-law debate expose the claims of his interlocutors based on these models as dangerously autocratic, yet his interventions do not fully set out the scope or nature of the kind of politics Zhang envisioned. “Self-awareness” models the structure into which individuals can be said to make meaningful, effective interventions in politics, but the concrete manifestations of self-awareness – why and how its cultivation may impact the shared environment – remain unspecified. This chapter begins to address these gaps by looking at what Zhang identifies as another of “the foundations of government” – namely the “self-use of talent” ( ziyong cai ). Zhang's invocation of talent as a political remedy is unusual for a democratic theory whose emphasis on equality tends to ignore or vilify the benefits accruing to expertise and natural ability. Talent is a concept invoked more commonly by late imperial Chinese officials, whose responses to political crisis often turned on the need for superiors to “find the [right] person” ( de qi ren ) with the necessary talents to execute particular tasks. Even in Chinese politics, how ever, talent is an ambiguous value. Sometimes associated with knowledge ( zhi ) but identified with activities as diverse as military strategy, literary composition, entrepreneurial ability, and mechanical craftsmanship, it tended to be seen either as unpredictable and potentially subversive, or as profoundly inefficacious, without proper regulation by virtue ( de ).

Key concepts: Zhàng, Politics, Virtue, Autocracy, Invocation, Democracy, Law and economics, Natural (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The self-use of talent — Research Paper | ScholarLens