2015Acta Veterinaria BrnoOpen access

Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of selected antimicrobials in bovine and swine Pasteurella multocida, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Kateřína Nedbalcová, Kateřina Nechvátalová, Z. Kučerová

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

We compared the values of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) values ​​of three antimicrobial agents for 72 bovine isolates of Pasteurella multocida , 80 swine isolates of P. multocida , 80 bovine isolates of Escherichia coli , 80 swine isolates of E. coli , and 80 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitis. The ratio of MIC 90 ​​/MPC 90 which limited mutant selection window (MSW) was ≤ 0.12/4 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 0.5/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in bovine P. multocida isolates, ≤ 0.12/2 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 0.5/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in swine P. multocida isolates, 1/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 8/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 8/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in bovine E. coli isolates, 0.5/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, ≥ 64/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 8/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in swine E. coli isolates, and 0.25/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 4/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in S. aureus isolates. These findings indicate that the dosage of antimicrobial agents to achieve serum concentration equal to or higher than MPC could reduce selection of resistant bacterial subpopulation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compared the values of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) values ​​of three antimicrobial agents for 72 bovine isolates of Pasteurella multocida , 80 swine isolates of P. multocida , 80 bovine isolates of Escherichia coli , 80 swine isolates of E. coli , and 80 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitis. The ratio of MIC 90 ​​/MPC 90 which limited mutant selection window (MSW) was ≤ 0.12/4 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 0.5/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in bovine P. multocida isolates, ≤ 0.12/2 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 0.5/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in swine P. multocida isolates, 1/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 8/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 8/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in bovine E. coli isolates, 0.5/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, ≥ 64/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 8/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in swine E. coli isolates, and 0.25/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 4/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in S. aureus isolates. These findings indicate that the dosage of antimicrobial agents to achieve serum concentration equal to or higher than MPC could reduce selection of resistant bacterial subpopulation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compared the values of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) values ​​of three antimicrobial agents for 72 bovine isolates of Pasteurella multocida , 80 swine isolates of P. multocida , 80 bovine isolates of Escherichia coli , 80 swine isolates of E. coli , and 80 isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine mastitis. The ratio of MIC 90 ​​/MPC 90 which limited mutant selection window (MSW) was ≤ 0.12/4 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 0.5/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in bovine P. multocida isolates, ≤ 0.12/2 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 0.5/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in swine P. multocida isolates, 1/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 8/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 8/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in bovine E. coli isolates, 0.5/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, ≥ 64/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 8/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in swine E. coli isolates, and 0.25/16 mg/l for enrofloxacin, 4/≥ 64 mg/l for florfenicol and 4/≥ 128 mg/l for tulathromycin in S. aureus isolates. These findings indicate that the dosage of antimicrobial agents to achieve serum concentration equal to or higher than MPC could reduce selection of resistant bacterial subpopulation.

Key concepts: Enrofloxacin, Florfenicol, Pasteurella multocida, Microbiology, Antimicrobial, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Minimum inhibitory concentration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of selected antimicrobials in bovine and swine Pasteurella multocida, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus isolates — Research Paper | ScholarLens