1993•PubMedRequires access

A comparative study of CHOP versus MEVP (mitoxantrone, etoposide, vindesine, prednisolone) therapy for intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a prospective randomized study.

T Takagi, K Sampi, Umihiko Sawada, Chikara Sakai, MINAKO OGURO

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

To evaluate a new combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone (MXT), etoposide (VP-16), vindesine (VDS), and prednisolone (MEVP therapy) as a front-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), a prospective randomized study comparing this therapy (28 patients) with CHOP therapy (29 patients) was conducted in 57 patients with intermediate-grade or high-grade NHL with stages II-IV. The MEVP therapy consisted of 10 mg/m2 of MXT intravenously on day 1, 2 mg/m2 of VDS intravenously on day 1, 200 mg/m2 of VP-16 orally on days 1-3, and 40 mg/m2 of prednisolone orally on days 1-5. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for up to 10 courses. Complete responses (CR) were achieved in 17 (63.0%) of the 27 evaluable patients treated with MEVP therapy, and in 20 (71.4%) of the 28 evaluable patients treated with CHOP therapy. Relapse-free survival rates and overall survival rates at 3 years were 58.8% and 46.4%, respectively, for the MEVP group and 70.0% and 54.0%, respectively, for the CHOP group. Granulocytopenia was more severer and associated infection episodes were more frequent in the MEVP group. MEVP therapy was effective as a front-line chemotherapy for intermediate- and high-grade NHL, although it was not superior to CHOP therapy in treatment effect and was not less toxic than CHOP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To evaluate a new combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone (MXT), etoposide (VP-16), vindesine (VDS), and prednisolone (MEVP therapy) as a front-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), a prospective randomized study comparing this therapy (28 patients) with CHOP therapy (29 patients) was conducted in 57 patients with intermediate-grade or high-grade NHL with stages II-IV. The MEVP therapy consisted of 10 mg/m2 of MXT intravenously on day 1, 2 mg/m2 of VDS intravenously on day 1, 200 mg/m2 of VP-16 orally on days 1-3, and 40 mg/m2 of prednisolone orally on days 1-5. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for up to 10 courses. Complete responses (CR) were achieved in 17 (63.0%) of the 27 evaluable patients treated with MEVP therapy, and in 20 (71.4%) of the 28 evaluable patients treated with CHOP therapy. Relapse-free survival rates and overall survival rates at 3 years were 58.8% and 46.4%, respectively, for the MEVP group and 70.0% and 54.0%, respectively, for the CHOP group. Granulocytopenia was more severer and associated infection episodes were more frequent in the MEVP group. MEVP therapy was effective as a front-line chemotherapy for intermediate- and high-grade NHL, although it was not superior to CHOP therapy in treatment effect and was not less toxic than CHOP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To evaluate a new combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone (MXT), etoposide (VP-16), vindesine (VDS), and prednisolone (MEVP therapy) as a front-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), a prospective randomized study comparing this therapy (28 patients) with CHOP therapy (29 patients) was conducted in 57 patients with intermediate-grade or high-grade NHL with stages II-IV. The MEVP therapy consisted of 10 mg/m2 of MXT intravenously on day 1, 2 mg/m2 of VDS intravenously on day 1, 200 mg/m2 of VP-16 orally on days 1-3, and 40 mg/m2 of prednisolone orally on days 1-5. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for up to 10 courses. Complete responses (CR) were achieved in 17 (63.0%) of the 27 evaluable patients treated with MEVP therapy, and in 20 (71.4%) of the 28 evaluable patients treated with CHOP therapy. Relapse-free survival rates and overall survival rates at 3 years were 58.8% and 46.4%, respectively, for the MEVP group and 70.0% and 54.0%, respectively, for the CHOP group. Granulocytopenia was more severer and associated infection episodes were more frequent in the MEVP group. MEVP therapy was effective as a front-line chemotherapy for intermediate- and high-grade NHL, although it was not superior to CHOP therapy in treatment effect and was not less toxic than CHOP.

Key concepts: Vindesine, Medicine, Mitoxantrone, Internal medicine, Etoposide, CHOP, Gastroenterology, Prednisolone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of CHOP versus MEVP (mitoxantrone, etoposide, vindesine, prednisolone) therapy for intermediate-grade and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a prospective randomized study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens