2014•MicroeconomicsRequires access

Alternative Theories of the Firm

Judy Whitehead

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Several issues have been raised concerning the neo-classical models of the firm. These traditional models, namely, perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly, are all subsumed under the label of marginalist models of the firm. This label derives from the way in which equilibrium (profit maximization) is achieved in all the models through the equating of the firm’s marginal cost with marginal revenue. From around the 1950s, these traditional theories have been seriously challenged and alternatives offered. In the same way that the traditional models were developed and modified to meet the changes in the business and productive sectors, newer models have emerged to take into account largely empirical changes observed in the market. Many of the newer alternatives tend to tread a thin line between economics and management.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several issues have been raised concerning the neo-classical models of the firm. These traditional models, namely, perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly, are all subsumed under the label of marginalist models of the firm. This label derives from the way in which equilibrium (profit maximization) is achieved in all the models through the equating of the firm’s marginal cost with marginal revenue. From around the 1950s, these traditional theories have been seriously challenged and alternatives offered. In the same way that the traditional models were developed and modified to meet the changes in the business and productive sectors, newer models have emerged to take into account largely empirical changes observed in the market. Many of the newer alternatives tend to tread a thin line between economics and management.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several issues have been raised concerning the neo-classical models of the firm. These traditional models, namely, perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition and oligopoly, are all subsumed under the label of marginalist models of the firm. This label derives from the way in which equilibrium (profit maximization) is achieved in all the models through the equating of the firm’s marginal cost with marginal revenue. From around the 1950s, these traditional theories have been seriously challenged and alternatives offered. In the same way that the traditional models were developed and modified to meet the changes in the business and productive sectors, newer models have emerged to take into account largely empirical changes observed in the market. Many of the newer alternatives tend to tread a thin line between economics and management.

Key concepts: Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Alternative Theories of the Firm — Research Paper | ScholarLens