2008The American SurgeonRequires access

Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Severe Isolated Pediatric Blunt Head Trauma

Alí Salim, Matthew Hannon, Carlos Brown, Pantelis Hadjizacharia, Leah M. Backhus, Pedro G. Teixeira, Linda S. Chan, Henri R. Ford

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

Very little research regarding standard treatments for pediatric traumatic brain injury (PTBI) exists. The objective of this study was to examine the use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring devices in PTBI and to determine if its use was associated with any outcome benefit. Data were collected from the Trauma Registry over an 11-year period (1996-2006) on all blunt trauma pediatric patients (age < 14 years) with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score < or =8. Data collected included: demographics, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Score, and use of an ICP monitor. Outcome measures included: mortality, complications, discharge location, and capacity. Thirty-three (25%) of 129 blunt PTBI patients had ICP monitors placed. Patients with monitors were more severely injured overall (Injury Severity Score: 25 vs. 18, P = 0.001) and had more severe head injury (81% head Abbreviated Injury Score > 3 vs. 55%, P = 0.01) than patients without monitors. However, there was no difference in mortality (28% vs. 35%, P = 0.52), discharge location (P = 0.10), and discharge capacity (P = 0.84). After multivariable analysis to adjust for the differences between the two study groups, the use of ICP monitor provided no survival benefit (adjusted odds ratio: 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3-4.1; adjusted P value = 0.85). The use of ICP monitor was, however, independently associated with a higher risk of developing extracranial complications (adjusted odds ratio: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.2-16.4; adjusted P value = 0.025). In conclusion, the use of ICP monitors in pediatric patients with severe isolated head injury provided no survival benefit and was associated with an increased risk of complications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Very little research regarding standard treatments for pediatric traumatic brain injury (PTBI) exists. The objective of this study was to examine the use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring devices in PTBI and to determine if its use was associated with any outcome benefit. Data were collected from the Trauma Registry over an 11-year period (1996-2006) on all blunt trauma pediatric patients (age < 14 years) with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score < or =8. Data collected included: demographics, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Score, and use of an ICP monitor. Outcome measures included: mortality, complications, discharge location, and capacity. Thirty-three (25%) of 129 blunt PTBI patients had ICP monitors placed. Patients with monitors were more severely injured overall (Injury Severity Score: 25 vs. 18, P = 0.001) and had more severe head injury (81% head Abbreviated Injury Score > 3 vs. 55%, P = 0.01) than patients without monitors. However, there was no difference in mortality (28% vs. 35%, P = 0.52), discharge location (P = 0.10), and discharge capacity (P = 0.84). After multivariable analysis to adjust for the differences between the two study groups, the use of ICP monitor provided no survival benefit (adjusted odds ratio: 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3-4.1; adjusted P value = 0.85). The use of ICP monitor was, however, independently associated with a higher risk of developing extracranial complications (adjusted odds ratio: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.2-16.4; adjusted P value = 0.025). In conclusion, the use of ICP monitors in pediatric patients with severe isolated head injury provided no survival benefit and was associated with an increased risk of complications.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Very little research regarding standard treatments for pediatric traumatic brain injury (PTBI) exists. The objective of this study was to examine the use of intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring devices in PTBI and to determine if its use was associated with any outcome benefit. Data were collected from the Trauma Registry over an 11-year period (1996-2006) on all blunt trauma pediatric patients (age < 14 years) with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale score < or =8. Data collected included: demographics, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, Abbreviated Injury Score, and use of an ICP monitor. Outcome measures included: mortality, complications, discharge location, and capacity. Thirty-three (25%) of 129 blunt PTBI patients had ICP monitors placed. Patients with monitors were more severely injured overall (Injury Severity Score: 25 vs. 18, P = 0.001) and had more severe head injury (81% head Abbreviated Injury Score > 3 vs. 55%, P = 0.01) than patients without monitors. However, there was no difference in mortality (28% vs. 35%, P = 0.52), discharge location (P = 0.10), and discharge capacity (P = 0.84). After multivariable analysis to adjust for the differences between the two study groups, the use of ICP monitor provided no survival benefit (adjusted odds ratio: 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3-4.1; adjusted P value = 0.85). The use of ICP monitor was, however, independently associated with a higher risk of developing extracranial complications (adjusted odds ratio: 4.3; 95% CI: 1.2-16.4; adjusted P value = 0.025). In conclusion, the use of ICP monitors in pediatric patients with severe isolated head injury provided no survival benefit and was associated with an increased risk of complications.

Key concepts: Medicine, Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, Odds ratio, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Confidence interval, Intracranial pressure monitoring, Intracranial pressure

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Severe Isolated Pediatric Blunt Head Trauma — Research Paper | ScholarLens