1987Unpublished venueRequires access

Philosophy of road assessment in Australia - the changing needs of a developing road system

G K Reid

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

With only a slight oversimplification, one might contrast the traditional bottom up approach to estimates of road funding needs with the top down approach required by present circumstances. During the growth phase of the road system it was appropriate, or at least acceptable, to determine the total road budget from the bottom up by summing the costs of projects needed to achieve technically specified standards. However, as the road system approaches maturity, it loses its special status and has to compete for funds with other needs of society. Road funds are then determined largely by outside constraints and road programs need to be designed from the top down to fit within a limited budget. Maintenance of the existing road system absorbs an increasing share of the budget and the case for the decreasing component of discretionary expenditure is more and more determined by political considerations. The important lesson for the analyst or technical advisor is that technically determined unique solutions to road planning and budgetary problems may not be appropriate. They may even be counterproductive if they conflict with strong political pressures and are not amenable to adjustment and iteration to take account of these pressures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

With only a slight oversimplification, one might contrast the traditional bottom up approach to estimates of road funding needs with the top down approach required by present circumstances. During the growth phase of the road system it was appropriate, or at least acceptable, to determine the total road budget from the bottom up by summing the costs of projects needed to achieve technically specified standards. However, as the road system approaches maturity, it loses its special status and has to compete for funds with other needs of society. Road funds are then determined largely by outside constraints and road programs need to be designed from the top down to fit within a limited budget. Maintenance of the existing road system absorbs an increasing share of the budget and the case for the decreasing component of discretionary expenditure is more and more determined by political considerations. The important lesson for the analyst or technical advisor is that technically determined unique solutions to road planning and budgetary problems may not be appropriate. They may even be counterproductive if they conflict with strong political pressures and are not amenable to adjustment and iteration to take account of these pressures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

With only a slight oversimplification, one might contrast the traditional bottom up approach to estimates of road funding needs with the top down approach required by present circumstances. During the growth phase of the road system it was appropriate, or at least acceptable, to determine the total road budget from the bottom up by summing the costs of projects needed to achieve technically specified standards. However, as the road system approaches maturity, it loses its special status and has to compete for funds with other needs of society. Road funds are then determined largely by outside constraints and road programs need to be designed from the top down to fit within a limited budget. Maintenance of the existing road system absorbs an increasing share of the budget and the case for the decreasing component of discretionary expenditure is more and more determined by political considerations. The important lesson for the analyst or technical advisor is that technically determined unique solutions to road planning and budgetary problems may not be appropriate. They may even be counterproductive if they conflict with strong political pressures and are not amenable to adjustment and iteration to take account of these pressures.

Key concepts: Maturity (psychological), Road map, Politics, Top-down and bottom-up design, Component (thermodynamics), Business, Phase (matter), Operations management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Philosophy of road assessment in Australia - the changing needs of a developing road system — Research Paper | ScholarLens