ScholarLens Back to search
2000•UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)Open access

Classical Legal Naturalism and the Politics of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000)

Robert Clinton

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

examples to suggest that a clear understanding of Marshall's decisions depends crucially upon a clear understanding of his jurisprudence-not as we understand it, but as he understood it.I.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

examples to suggest that a clear understanding of Marshall's decisions depends crucially upon a clear understanding of his jurisprudence-not as we understand it, but as he understood it.I.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

examples to suggest that a clear understanding of Marshall's decisions depends crucially upon a clear understanding of his jurisprudence-not as we understand it, but as he understood it.I.

Key concepts: Jurisprudence, Naturalism, Law, Politics, Philosophy, Political science, Law and economics, Sociology

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Classical Legal Naturalism and the Politics of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000) — Research Paper | ScholarLens