2009Unpublished venueRequires access

A comparative subgrade evaluation using CBR, vane shear, light weight deflectometer, and resilient modulus tests

Neetu Garg, H Brar, Albert Larkin

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) is generally used in airport pavement thickness design procedures to characterize subgrade soils. Alternative thickness design procedure based on layered elastic analysis has also been available (LEDFAA) since 1995 which accepts either subgrade CBR or resilient modulus. The CBR value is converted to resilient modulus in psi by multiplying by 1,500. The relationship is based on a correlation between dynamic modulus and CBR measured for soils and aggregates. A strong trend is apparent in the correlation but there is a lot of scatter. Resilient modulus, in combination with a measure of strength such as shear, could displace CBR as a means of characterizing subgrade soils. Therefore, it is necessary to understand and document the relationships between CBR and other methods of characterizing soils. This study summarizes the preliminary results obtained from subgrade characterization testing (CBR, vane shear, light weight deflectometer, and repeated load triaxial tests) at the FAA NAPTF.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) is generally used in airport pavement thickness design procedures to characterize subgrade soils. Alternative thickness design procedure based on layered elastic analysis has also been available (LEDFAA) since 1995 which accepts either subgrade CBR or resilient modulus. The CBR value is converted to resilient modulus in psi by multiplying by 1,500. The relationship is based on a correlation between dynamic modulus and CBR measured for soils and aggregates. A strong trend is apparent in the correlation but there is a lot of scatter. Resilient modulus, in combination with a measure of strength such as shear, could displace CBR as a means of characterizing subgrade soils. Therefore, it is necessary to understand and document the relationships between CBR and other methods of characterizing soils. This study summarizes the preliminary results obtained from subgrade characterization testing (CBR, vane shear, light weight deflectometer, and repeated load triaxial tests) at the FAA NAPTF.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) is generally used in airport pavement thickness design procedures to characterize subgrade soils. Alternative thickness design procedure based on layered elastic analysis has also been available (LEDFAA) since 1995 which accepts either subgrade CBR or resilient modulus. The CBR value is converted to resilient modulus in psi by multiplying by 1,500. The relationship is based on a correlation between dynamic modulus and CBR measured for soils and aggregates. A strong trend is apparent in the correlation but there is a lot of scatter. Resilient modulus, in combination with a measure of strength such as shear, could displace CBR as a means of characterizing subgrade soils. Therefore, it is necessary to understand and document the relationships between CBR and other methods of characterizing soils. This study summarizes the preliminary results obtained from subgrade characterization testing (CBR, vane shear, light weight deflectometer, and repeated load triaxial tests) at the FAA NAPTF.

Key concepts: Subgrade, Falling weight deflectometer, Geotechnical engineering, Shear modulus, Modulus, Materials science, Structural engineering, Geology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative subgrade evaluation using CBR, vane shear, light weight deflectometer, and resilient modulus tests — Research Paper | ScholarLens