2007Unpublished venueRequires access

A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Password Quality

Wanli Ma, John Campbell, Dat Tran, Dale Kleeman

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Summary Password authentication is the most widely used authentication mechanism, and it will still be with us for many years yet to come. It is effective, simple, and accurate, with no extra cost. The strength of password authentication relies on the strength of the passwords. Good (or strong) passwords are essential for high level security. End user education and computerized proactive password checking play vital roles in ensuring good passwords. However, both demand clear, simple, and concise rules on what a good password is. It is not hard to find guidelines and advices on good passwords; but it is not so easy to find a clear, simple, and concise rule to be used for end user education and computer programs for proactive password checking. In this paper, we develop a theoretic framework on measuring password quality – password quality indicator (PQI). A PQI of a password is a pair λ=(D, L ) , where D is the Levenshtein's edit distance of the password to the base dictionary words, and

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Password authentication is the most widely used authentication mechanism, and it will still be with us for many years yet to come. It is effective, simple, and accurate, with no extra cost. The strength of password authentication relies on the strength of the passwords. Good (or strong) passwords are essential for high level security. End user education and computerized proactive password checking play vital roles in ensuring good passwords. However, both demand clear, simple, and concise rules on what a good password is. It is not hard to find guidelines and advices on good passwords; but it is not so easy to find a clear, simple, and concise rule to be used for end user education and computer programs for proactive password checking. In this paper, we develop a theoretic framework on measuring password quality – password quality indicator (PQI). A PQI of a password is a pair λ=(D, L ) , where D is the Levenshtein's edit distance of the password to the base dictionary words, and

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Password authentication is the most widely used authentication mechanism, and it will still be with us for many years yet to come. It is effective, simple, and accurate, with no extra cost. The strength of password authentication relies on the strength of the passwords. Good (or strong) passwords are essential for high level security. End user education and computerized proactive password checking play vital roles in ensuring good passwords. However, both demand clear, simple, and concise rules on what a good password is. It is not hard to find guidelines and advices on good passwords; but it is not so easy to find a clear, simple, and concise rule to be used for end user education and computer programs for proactive password checking. In this paper, we develop a theoretic framework on measuring password quality – password quality indicator (PQI). A PQI of a password is a pair λ=(D, L ) , where D is the Levenshtein's edit distance of the password to the base dictionary words, and

Key concepts: Password, Cognitive password, Password strength, S/KEY, Password policy, Computer science, Computer security, Zero-knowledge password proof

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Password Quality — Research Paper | ScholarLens