Commuter Surge Boosts State Capitals Investment
John R. Hoyle
Abstract
John R. Hoyle
Abstract
The author examines the responses of Australia's five largest cities to commuter rail patronage's near record levels. Extra tracks and new trains are among the ways Sydney, Brisbane, Adelaide, Melbourne, and Perth are coping with surges in ridership. All but Adelaide are electrified. In terms of funding and investment, both the Australian federal government and opposition assist states in additional urban road construction, but insist urban rail is a state responsibility.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The author examines the responses of Australia's five largest cities to commuter rail patronage's near record levels. Extra tracks and new trains are among the ways Sydney, Brisbane, Adelaide, Melbourne, and Perth are coping with surges in ridership. All but Adelaide are electrified. In terms of funding and investment, both the Australian federal government and opposition assist states in additional urban road construction, but insist urban rail is a state responsibility.
Key concepts: Train, Opposition (politics), State government, Investment (military), Surge, State (computer science), Government (linguistics), Light rail transit