State Sovereignty and the Two Faces of Federalism: A Comparative Study of Federal Jurisdiction and the Conflict of Laws
Lea Brilmayer, Ronald D. Lee
Abstract
Open-access reader
Lea Brilmayer, Ronald D. Lee
Abstract
Open-access reader
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 293 (1980) (despite growth in economic interdependence of states, state lines are still relevant for jurisdictional purposes); Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 44 (1971) ("Our Federalism" requires that national government vindicate federal rights and interests without undue interference with a state's legitimate activities).
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 293 (1980) (despite growth in economic interdependence of states, state lines are still relevant for jurisdictional purposes); Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 44 (1971) ("Our Federalism" requires that national government vindicate federal rights and interests without undue interference with a state's legitimate activities).
Key concepts: Federalism, Law, Sovereignty, Jurisdiction, Political science, Federal jurisdiction, State (computer science), Conflict of laws