1977Progress in PlanningRequires access

DECLINING PUBLIC TRANSPORT: IS CAR OWNERSHIP TO BLAME?

I G Heggie, John Bailey

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The authors give reasons for their disagreement with the generally held principle; they contend that changes in fare levels have been far more influential and that Department of Transport's fare index underestimates real increases. The relationship between car ownership and the usage of road public transport when compared with the expected change in stage passenger journeys using the D.TP formula shows that increasing car ownership explains only a relatively small proportion of the decline. Analysis of the national travel surveys indicate that about two thirds of the loss in patronage is due to other factors. The authors claim that the estimated 11 per cent decline in patronage due to the increased fares in real terms amounts to another 30 per cent of the observed decline. The evidence given in the paper suggests that more weight should be given to the effects of price on bus travel as opposed to changes in its quality. /TRRL/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The authors give reasons for their disagreement with the generally held principle; they contend that changes in fare levels have been far more influential and that Department of Transport's fare index underestimates real increases. The relationship between car ownership and the usage of road public transport when compared with the expected change in stage passenger journeys using the D.TP formula shows that increasing car ownership explains only a relatively small proportion of the decline. Analysis of the national travel surveys indicate that about two thirds of the loss in patronage is due to other factors. The authors claim that the estimated 11 per cent decline in patronage due to the increased fares in real terms amounts to another 30 per cent of the observed decline. The evidence given in the paper suggests that more weight should be given to the effects of price on bus travel as opposed to changes in its quality. /TRRL/

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The authors give reasons for their disagreement with the generally held principle; they contend that changes in fare levels have been far more influential and that Department of Transport's fare index underestimates real increases. The relationship between car ownership and the usage of road public transport when compared with the expected change in stage passenger journeys using the D.TP formula shows that increasing car ownership explains only a relatively small proportion of the decline. Analysis of the national travel surveys indicate that about two thirds of the loss in patronage is due to other factors. The authors claim that the estimated 11 per cent decline in patronage due to the increased fares in real terms amounts to another 30 per cent of the observed decline. The evidence given in the paper suggests that more weight should be given to the effects of price on bus travel as opposed to changes in its quality. /TRRL/

Key concepts: Car ownership, Public transport, Blame, Index (typography), Private transport, Passenger transport, Demographic economics, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DECLINING PUBLIC TRANSPORT: IS CAR OWNERSHIP TO BLAME? — Research Paper | ScholarLens