Uniqueness of Meromorphic Functions and Question of Gross
Hong‐Xun Yi
Abstract
Hong‐Xun Yi
Abstract
Abstract. In this paper, we deal with the uniqueness of meromorphic functions con-cerning one question of Gross (see [5, Question 6]), and obtain some results that areimprovements of that of former authors. Moreover, the example shows that the result issharp. 1. Introduction and main resultsIn this paper, the term \meromorphic will always mean meromorphic in thecomplex plane C. We assume that the reader is familiar with the basic results andnotations of Nevanlinna's value distribution theory (see [6]), such as T (r;f ), N (r;f )and m (r;f ). Meanwhile, we need the following notations. Let f (z) be a meromor-phic function. We denote by n 1) (r;f ) the number of simple poles of f in jzj · r,N 1) (r;f ) is de¯ned in terms of n 1) (r;f ) in the usual way (see [19]). We furtherde¯ne± 1) (1 ; f ) = 1 i limsup r !1 N 1) (r;f )T (r;f ):By the de¯nition of N 1) (r;f ), we haveN 1) (r;f ) · N (r;f ) ·12N 1) (r;f )+12N (r;f ) ·12N 1) (r;f )+12T (r;f ):From this we obtain(1)12± 1) (1 ;f ) ·12±
OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract. In this paper, we deal with the uniqueness of meromorphic functions con-cerning one question of Gross (see [5, Question 6]), and obtain some results that areimprovements of that of former authors. Moreover, the example shows that the result issharp. 1. Introduction and main resultsIn this paper, the term \meromorphic will always mean meromorphic in thecomplex plane C. We assume that the reader is familiar with the basic results andnotations of Nevanlinna's value distribution theory (see [6]), such as T (r;f ), N (r;f )and m (r;f ). Meanwhile, we need the following notations. Let f (z) be a meromor-phic function. We denote by n 1) (r;f ) the number of simple poles of f in jzj · r,N 1) (r;f ) is de¯ned in terms of n 1) (r;f ) in the usual way (see [19]). We furtherde¯ne± 1) (1 ; f ) = 1 i limsup r !1 N 1) (r;f )T (r;f ):By the de¯nition of N 1) (r;f ), we haveN 1) (r;f ) · N (r;f ) ·12N 1) (r;f )+12N (r;f ) ·12N 1) (r;f )+12T (r;f ):From this we obtain(1)12± 1) (1 ;f ) ·12±
Key concepts: Meromorphic function, Uniqueness, Mathematics, Nevanlinna theory, Complex plane, Combinatorics, Function (biology), Distribution (mathematics)