1998Unpublished venueRequires access

WATER LINE SPLITTING IN GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA

J S Gifford, L J Ruffin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper describes a Gainesville Regional Utilities demonstration project that explored the use of traditional open trenching methods versus the trenchless method of pipe splitting for the rehabilitation of 152 m (500 ft) of existing 50 mm (2 in.) Schedule 40 galvanized steel pipe in service as a potable water line. The galvanized steel pipe was replaced by using the pipe splitting method and pulling new 50 mm outside diameter polyethylene pipe into place. The hydraulics of the existing galvanized steel pipe and new polyethylene pipe are compared. Economic comparisons of the traditional method versus the trenchless method of pipe splitting are presented. Construction advantages and other considerations associated with the trenchless method demonstrated are also discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper describes a Gainesville Regional Utilities demonstration project that explored the use of traditional open trenching methods versus the trenchless method of pipe splitting for the rehabilitation of 152 m (500 ft) of existing 50 mm (2 in.) Schedule 40 galvanized steel pipe in service as a potable water line. The galvanized steel pipe was replaced by using the pipe splitting method and pulling new 50 mm outside diameter polyethylene pipe into place. The hydraulics of the existing galvanized steel pipe and new polyethylene pipe are compared. Economic comparisons of the traditional method versus the trenchless method of pipe splitting are presented. Construction advantages and other considerations associated with the trenchless method demonstrated are also discussed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper describes a Gainesville Regional Utilities demonstration project that explored the use of traditional open trenching methods versus the trenchless method of pipe splitting for the rehabilitation of 152 m (500 ft) of existing 50 mm (2 in.) Schedule 40 galvanized steel pipe in service as a potable water line. The galvanized steel pipe was replaced by using the pipe splitting method and pulling new 50 mm outside diameter polyethylene pipe into place. The hydraulics of the existing galvanized steel pipe and new polyethylene pipe are compared. Economic comparisons of the traditional method versus the trenchless method of pipe splitting are presented. Construction advantages and other considerations associated with the trenchless method demonstrated are also discussed.

Key concepts: Trenchless technology, Water pipe, Nominal Pipe Size, Engineering, Pipeline transport, Galvanization, Line (geometry), Potable water

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
WATER LINE SPLITTING IN GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA — Research Paper | ScholarLens