Wind-tunnel buffeting measurements on two wing end-plate airplane model configurations
W. B. Igoe
Abstract
Open-access reader
W. B. Igoe
Abstract
Open-access reader
During the course of wind-tunnel force tests on a 1/30-scale model of a proposed subsonic nuclear -powered airplane in the Langley 16 -foot transonic tunnel, wing-buffeting measurements were made on two different wingend-plate model configurations.The low-aspect-ratio (3.6) wing had a leading-edge sweepback angle of 51°, and the highaspect-ratio (6.0) wing had a leading-edge sweepback angle of 36O.The model support system introduced undesirable buffeting response vibration modes in the same frequency range as the model wing vibration modes.On a comparative basis, the high-aspect-ratio wing configuration generally exhibited a more abrupt entry into buffeting with increasing angle of attack and had a lower lift coefficient for the onset of buffeting than that of the lowasp ec t -r atio wing configuration.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
During the course of wind-tunnel force tests on a 1/30-scale model of a proposed subsonic nuclear -powered airplane in the Langley 16 -foot transonic tunnel, wing-buffeting measurements were made on two different wingend-plate model configurations.The low-aspect-ratio (3.6) wing had a leading-edge sweepback angle of 51°, and the highaspect-ratio (6.0) wing had a leading-edge sweepback angle of 36O.The model support system introduced undesirable buffeting response vibration modes in the same frequency range as the model wing vibration modes.On a comparative basis, the high-aspect-ratio wing configuration generally exhibited a more abrupt entry into buffeting with increasing angle of attack and had a lower lift coefficient for the onset of buffeting than that of the lowasp ec t -r atio wing configuration.
Key concepts: Aeroelasticity, Airplane, Wind tunnel, Wing, Car model, Engineering, Structural engineering, Aerodynamics