RE-THINKING HOV - HIGH OCCUPANCY VEHICLE FACILITIES AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST
C K Leman, P. Schiller, K Pauly
Abstract
C K Leman, P. Schiller, K Pauly
Abstract
This paper reviews the history of the high occupancy vehicle (HOV) concept and explores the assumptions underlying the expansion of HOV facilities. Some in highway and transit agencies argue that the construction of HOV lanes is a revolutionary new direction that will improve transportation efficiency, provide incentives for higher occupancies, promote transit, and reduce car trips, vehicle miles traveled, and air pollution. The authors of this paper question these claims and suggest that new HOV lane construction, as now being planned and implemented, is simply increasing the roadway space devoted to the automobile. They state that A car with two occupants is a low occupancy vehicle, not high occupancy: a date is not a carpool. They find that, in the long run, HOV lanes may worsen air quality, reduce transit mode share, and increase vehicle trips and the miles driven. Constructing HOV lanes on long stretches of freeway encourages urban sprawl and diverts resources from needed improvements in transit within cities.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper reviews the history of the high occupancy vehicle (HOV) concept and explores the assumptions underlying the expansion of HOV facilities. Some in highway and transit agencies argue that the construction of HOV lanes is a revolutionary new direction that will improve transportation efficiency, provide incentives for higher occupancies, promote transit, and reduce car trips, vehicle miles traveled, and air pollution. The authors of this paper question these claims and suggest that new HOV lane construction, as now being planned and implemented, is simply increasing the roadway space devoted to the automobile. They state that A car with two occupants is a low occupancy vehicle, not high occupancy: a date is not a carpool. They find that, in the long run, HOV lanes may worsen air quality, reduce transit mode share, and increase vehicle trips and the miles driven. Constructing HOV lanes on long stretches of freeway encourages urban sprawl and diverts resources from needed improvements in transit within cities.
Key concepts: Carpool, Occupancy, Transport engineering, TRIPS architecture, Public transport, Transit (satellite), Vehicle miles of travel, Urban sprawl