1991The PlannerRequires access

TRAFFIC GROWTH AND PLANNING POLICY

Max Dixon

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The London Research Centre was commissioned in the Spring of 1990 by the RTPI (Royal Town Planning Institute) to carry out a study of traffic growth and planning policy against a background of National Road Traffic Forecasts (NRTF) of growth between 83% and 142% by 2025. A wide range of planning authorities, professionals, business and other organisations were consulted and this article outlines the findings of the report. Transport is seen as a major influence on urban form. NRTF would appear to represent 'unrestrained demand' which would in fact be restrained by capacity. Development control is at present more concerned with highways than the transport issues which influence urban form in the long term. There is also a limit to what town planning mechanisms can achieve in relation to traffic restraint on their own. Other policy instruments such as taxation of fuel and employer-provided parking need to work with land use planning. A debate is advocated on the future form of urban areas and what level of sacrifice people are prepared to accept in private mobility for the common good. Areas requiring further investigation are identified and include the relationship between traffic congestion/restraint and the health of local economies, the potential effect of road pricing on land-use dispersal, homeworking and the concept of 'car-free' zones.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The London Research Centre was commissioned in the Spring of 1990 by the RTPI (Royal Town Planning Institute) to carry out a study of traffic growth and planning policy against a background of National Road Traffic Forecasts (NRTF) of growth between 83% and 142% by 2025. A wide range of planning authorities, professionals, business and other organisations were consulted and this article outlines the findings of the report. Transport is seen as a major influence on urban form. NRTF would appear to represent 'unrestrained demand' which would in fact be restrained by capacity. Development control is at present more concerned with highways than the transport issues which influence urban form in the long term. There is also a limit to what town planning mechanisms can achieve in relation to traffic restraint on their own. Other policy instruments such as taxation of fuel and employer-provided parking need to work with land use planning. A debate is advocated on the future form of urban areas and what level of sacrifice people are prepared to accept in private mobility for the common good. Areas requiring further investigation are identified and include the relationship between traffic congestion/restraint and the health of local economies, the potential effect of road pricing on land-use dispersal, homeworking and the concept of 'car-free' zones.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The London Research Centre was commissioned in the Spring of 1990 by the RTPI (Royal Town Planning Institute) to carry out a study of traffic growth and planning policy against a background of National Road Traffic Forecasts (NRTF) of growth between 83% and 142% by 2025. A wide range of planning authorities, professionals, business and other organisations were consulted and this article outlines the findings of the report. Transport is seen as a major influence on urban form. NRTF would appear to represent 'unrestrained demand' which would in fact be restrained by capacity. Development control is at present more concerned with highways than the transport issues which influence urban form in the long term. There is also a limit to what town planning mechanisms can achieve in relation to traffic restraint on their own. Other policy instruments such as taxation of fuel and employer-provided parking need to work with land use planning. A debate is advocated on the future form of urban areas and what level of sacrifice people are prepared to accept in private mobility for the common good. Areas requiring further investigation are identified and include the relationship between traffic congestion/restraint and the health of local economies, the potential effect of road pricing on land-use dispersal, homeworking and the concept of 'car-free' zones.

Key concepts: Transportation planning, Urban planning, Work (physics), Land-use planning, Business, Traffic congestion, Control (management), Car ownership

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
TRAFFIC GROWTH AND PLANNING POLICY — Research Paper | ScholarLens