LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AND BUS INTEGRATION IN EDMONTON (ABRIDGMENT)
J J Bakker
Abstract
J J Bakker
Abstract
This paper discusses the appropriateness of light rail transit (LRT) and bus integration as a public transportation option in Edmonton. Three transportation options were considered: a northeast freeway option that would require 70 buses during peak periods; including express services for the corridor; an all-bus option that would require use of 150 buses during peak periods, including express services through the central area of the city; and an integrated bus-LRT option that would require 75 buses during peak periods to serve mainly as feeders and cross-city services, together with 14 LRT cars on the northeast line. An integrated option means that the LRT line is part of the transit network but uses a different technology. It was concluded that the LRT-bus system has proved able to handle the existing transit patronage and has attracted additional riders, notwithstanding the introduction of transfers. The conversion from express buses to feeder buses-LRT has been accepted as an attractive alternative. The integrated system has also shown its worth during special events at the Coliseum, Exhibition grounds, and Stadium; however, a system capable of carrying 5,400 people an hour in one direction cannot be expected to fill a stadium of 46,000 people. The disadvantage of the LRT system is that it does not serve two major trip destinations--the government center and the university--without a second transfer. A fully valid solution probably requires a more complete system.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper discusses the appropriateness of light rail transit (LRT) and bus integration as a public transportation option in Edmonton. Three transportation options were considered: a northeast freeway option that would require 70 buses during peak periods; including express services for the corridor; an all-bus option that would require use of 150 buses during peak periods, including express services through the central area of the city; and an integrated bus-LRT option that would require 75 buses during peak periods to serve mainly as feeders and cross-city services, together with 14 LRT cars on the northeast line. An integrated option means that the LRT line is part of the transit network but uses a different technology. It was concluded that the LRT-bus system has proved able to handle the existing transit patronage and has attracted additional riders, notwithstanding the introduction of transfers. The conversion from express buses to feeder buses-LRT has been accepted as an attractive alternative. The integrated system has also shown its worth during special events at the Coliseum, Exhibition grounds, and Stadium; however, a system capable of carrying 5,400 people an hour in one direction cannot be expected to fill a stadium of 46,000 people. The disadvantage of the LRT system is that it does not serve two major trip destinations--the government center and the university--without a second transfer. A fully valid solution probably requires a more complete system.
Key concepts: Transport engineering, Public transport, Transit (satellite), Light rail transit, Exhibition, Disadvantage, Light rail, Destinations