1994Open Archive Toulouse Archive Ouverte (University of Toulouse)Open access

Dexterous external space manipulation: serial or parallel concepts comparison

Daniel Alazard, Jean-Pierre Chrétien

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Within the external space manipulation framework, we compare two concepts to achieve an accurate positioning of the manipulator end effector. The first one involves a serial mini-manipulator inserted between the external space manipulator (macro-manipulator) and the end effector. Then, an anchorage mechanism is required to provide a hold point to the macro / mini manipulators interface. This solution can be called: static positioning of the minimanipulator \nbase. The anchorage system stiffness is then discussed. In the second concept,the mini-manipulator serial architecture is replaced by a light parallel architecture. The macro \nmanipulator is then used to provide a dynamic positioning to the mini-manipulator base by the mean of a coordinated control scheme between both manipulators.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Within the external space manipulation framework, we compare two concepts to achieve an accurate positioning of the manipulator end effector. The first one involves a serial mini-manipulator inserted between the external space manipulator (macro-manipulator) and the end effector. Then, an anchorage mechanism is required to provide a hold point to the macro / mini manipulators interface. This solution can be called: static positioning of the minimanipulator \nbase. The anchorage system stiffness is then discussed. In the second concept,the mini-manipulator serial architecture is replaced by a light parallel architecture. The macro \nmanipulator is then used to provide a dynamic positioning to the mini-manipulator base by the mean of a coordinated control scheme between both manipulators.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Within the external space manipulation framework, we compare two concepts to achieve an accurate positioning of the manipulator end effector. The first one involves a serial mini-manipulator inserted between the external space manipulator (macro-manipulator) and the end effector. Then, an anchorage mechanism is required to provide a hold point to the macro / mini manipulators interface. This solution can be called: static positioning of the minimanipulator \nbase. The anchorage system stiffness is then discussed. In the second concept,the mini-manipulator serial architecture is replaced by a light parallel architecture. The macro \nmanipulator is then used to provide a dynamic positioning to the mini-manipulator base by the mean of a coordinated control scheme between both manipulators.

Key concepts: Parallel manipulator, Serial manipulator, Mobile manipulator, Base (topology), Manipulator (device), Computer science, Control theory (sociology), Robot end effector

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dexterous external space manipulation: serial or parallel concepts comparison — Research Paper | ScholarLens