1998•Journal of Environmental SciencesRequires access

Evaluation of Exposure Times for Periphyton Biomass Estimate using Artificial Substrata in Headwater Streams

Hyun‐Woo Kim, Kyong Ha, Gea-Jae Joo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

During the spring and fall of 1994 and winter of 1995, the exposure time of periphyton biomass on terval. In the streams with low periphyton biomass (chi. a: 2-4 mg/) in natural rocks, biomass of arttificial substrata (unglazed tile: ) exceeded that of the natural rocks after 28 days, while sites with high biomass (chi. a: 20-60 mg/) in natural rocks showed slower biomass accumulation after 40 days. Due to the high licht input and temperature in a Partially shaded mountain stream, development of periphyton biomass in spring occurred faster than that of winter. In general, development of periphyton biomass placed on artificial substrata took 4-5 weeks in spring and at least 6 weeks In winter to reach the natural level.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

During the spring and fall of 1994 and winter of 1995, the exposure time of periphyton biomass on terval. In the streams with low periphyton biomass (chi. a: 2-4 mg/) in natural rocks, biomass of arttificial substrata (unglazed tile: ) exceeded that of the natural rocks after 28 days, while sites with high biomass (chi. a: 20-60 mg/) in natural rocks showed slower biomass accumulation after 40 days. Due to the high licht input and temperature in a Partially shaded mountain stream, development of periphyton biomass in spring occurred faster than that of winter. In general, development of periphyton biomass placed on artificial substrata took 4-5 weeks in spring and at least 6 weeks In winter to reach the natural level.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

During the spring and fall of 1994 and winter of 1995, the exposure time of periphyton biomass on terval. In the streams with low periphyton biomass (chi. a: 2-4 mg/) in natural rocks, biomass of arttificial substrata (unglazed tile: ) exceeded that of the natural rocks after 28 days, while sites with high biomass (chi. a: 20-60 mg/) in natural rocks showed slower biomass accumulation after 40 days. Due to the high licht input and temperature in a Partially shaded mountain stream, development of periphyton biomass in spring occurred faster than that of winter. In general, development of periphyton biomass placed on artificial substrata took 4-5 weeks in spring and at least 6 weeks In winter to reach the natural level.

Key concepts: Periphyton, Biomass (ecology), STREAMS, Spring (device), Environmental science, Invertebrate, Hydrology (agriculture), Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Exposure Times for Periphyton Biomass Estimate using Artificial Substrata in Headwater Streams — Research Paper | ScholarLens