DESIGN PHILOSOPHIES IN AUTOMATIC TRAIN CONTROL
J E Freehafer
Abstract
J E Freehafer
Abstract
Two broad categories of automatic control have emerged in 15 years of rapid transit automation, identified by use of track circuits or separate conductors for the ground-to- train communications channel. Continental Europe has favored a wide-band link which gives flexibility in allocating functions to lineside and on-train equipment, but places heavy reliance on reliability of electronic logic. North American practice, represented by the Washington Metro, is to build up a control hierarchy from elements which can function independently in the event of failure.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Two broad categories of automatic control have emerged in 15 years of rapid transit automation, identified by use of track circuits or separate conductors for the ground-to- train communications channel. Continental Europe has favored a wide-band link which gives flexibility in allocating functions to lineside and on-train equipment, but places heavy reliance on reliability of electronic logic. North American practice, represented by the Washington Metro, is to build up a control hierarchy from elements which can function independently in the event of failure.
Key concepts: Automatic train control, Track circuit, Flexibility (engineering), Track (disk drive), Automation, Engineering, Control logic, Reliability (semiconductor)