2010European Transport Conference, 2010Association for European Transport (AET)Requires access

Preference Heterogeneity and Attribute Non-attendance: Can They be Separated?

Danny Campbell, Stephane Hess

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper will discuss how, within the context of discrete choice experiments, when offered a choice between a bundle of goods, respondents are expected to choose the good that delivers them the highest utility. In making this choice, it is assumed that the respondent evaluates each and every attribute and makes trade-offs between them. There is growing empirical evidence that there is process heterogeneity in the way that respondents evaluate bundles of attributes. Importantly, in many situations it is found that respondents do not comply with this continuity assumption. In such cases, respondents adopt an attribute processing strategy where they behave in a rationally adaptive manner. One specific strategy adopted by respondents is their decision to pay attention to only a subset of the attributes, ignoring all other differences between the attributes, referred to as attribute non-attendance.The estimation of discrete choice models with random coefficients has all but become standard practice since it helps uncover the unobserved heterogeneity. However, given the growing literature on attribute non-attendance it may be unclear if the uncovered preference heterogeneity is influenced by non-attendance. In the same way, where attempts have been made to accommodate attribute non-attendance, it may be difficult to determine if it is preference heterogeneity or attribute non-attendance that is retrieved. In this paper the authors compare the potential of discrete and continuous mixture distributions in accommodating and distinguishing preference heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance. To test the methodology the authors use four simulated stated preference datasets and a real dataset. The results show that attribute non-attendance exaggerates the degree of preference heterogeneity and, similarly, preference heterogeneity leads to an overestimation of the extent of attribute non-attendance. The authors demonstrate the need to discriminate between preference heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance, resulting in significant improvements in model fit and more accurate estimates.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper will discuss how, within the context of discrete choice experiments, when offered a choice between a bundle of goods, respondents are expected to choose the good that delivers them the highest utility. In making this choice, it is assumed that the respondent evaluates each and every attribute and makes trade-offs between them. There is growing empirical evidence that there is process heterogeneity in the way that respondents evaluate bundles of attributes. Importantly, in many situations it is found that respondents do not comply with this continuity assumption. In such cases, respondents adopt an attribute processing strategy where they behave in a rationally adaptive manner. One specific strategy adopted by respondents is their decision to pay attention to only a subset of the attributes, ignoring all other differences between the attributes, referred to as attribute non-attendance.The estimation of discrete choice models with random coefficients has all but become standard practice since it helps uncover the unobserved heterogeneity. However, given the growing literature on attribute non-attendance it may be unclear if the uncovered preference heterogeneity is influenced by non-attendance. In the same way, where attempts have been made to accommodate attribute non-attendance, it may be difficult to determine if it is preference heterogeneity or attribute non-attendance that is retrieved. In this paper the authors compare the potential of discrete and continuous mixture distributions in accommodating and distinguishing preference heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance. To test the methodology the authors use four simulated stated preference datasets and a real dataset. The results show that attribute non-attendance exaggerates the degree of preference heterogeneity and, similarly, preference heterogeneity leads to an overestimation of the extent of attribute non-attendance. The authors demonstrate the need to discriminate between preference heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance, resulting in significant improvements in model fit and more accurate estimates.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper will discuss how, within the context of discrete choice experiments, when offered a choice between a bundle of goods, respondents are expected to choose the good that delivers them the highest utility. In making this choice, it is assumed that the respondent evaluates each and every attribute and makes trade-offs between them. There is growing empirical evidence that there is process heterogeneity in the way that respondents evaluate bundles of attributes. Importantly, in many situations it is found that respondents do not comply with this continuity assumption. In such cases, respondents adopt an attribute processing strategy where they behave in a rationally adaptive manner. One specific strategy adopted by respondents is their decision to pay attention to only a subset of the attributes, ignoring all other differences between the attributes, referred to as attribute non-attendance.The estimation of discrete choice models with random coefficients has all but become standard practice since it helps uncover the unobserved heterogeneity. However, given the growing literature on attribute non-attendance it may be unclear if the uncovered preference heterogeneity is influenced by non-attendance. In the same way, where attempts have been made to accommodate attribute non-attendance, it may be difficult to determine if it is preference heterogeneity or attribute non-attendance that is retrieved. In this paper the authors compare the potential of discrete and continuous mixture distributions in accommodating and distinguishing preference heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance. To test the methodology the authors use four simulated stated preference datasets and a real dataset. The results show that attribute non-attendance exaggerates the degree of preference heterogeneity and, similarly, preference heterogeneity leads to an overestimation of the extent of attribute non-attendance. The authors demonstrate the need to discriminate between preference heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance, resulting in significant improvements in model fit and more accurate estimates.

Key concepts: Preference, Respondent, Context (archaeology), Attendance, Pairwise comparison, Econometrics, Computer science, Process (computing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preference Heterogeneity and Attribute Non-attendance: Can They be Separated? — Research Paper | ScholarLens